Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

ISAR-SAFE: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stenting

  • Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance
  • Technical University of Munich
  • St. Antonius Hospital
  • University Heart Center Freiburg
  • Shenyang Northern Hospital
  • Leuven University Center for Metabolic Bone Diseases
  • Herzzentrum der Segeberger Kliniken Gruppe
  • University Witten-Herdecke
  • Aarhus University
  • Krankenhaus Landshut-Achdorf
  • University Medical Center
  • Department of Cardiology
  • MediClin Herzzentrum Lahr/Baden
  • University Medical Center Ulm and Center of Excellence 'Metabolic Disorders'
  • University of Florida College of Medicine
  • Klinikum der Universität Regensburg und Medizinische Fakultät
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

428 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background In patients receiving aspirin, the optimal duration of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unclear. Methods This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial tested the hypothesis that in patients undergoing DES implantation, 6 months of clopidogrel is non-inferior to 12 months in terms of clinical outcomes. At 6 months after DES implantation, patients on clopidogrel were randomly assigned to either a 6-month period of placebo or an additional 6-month period of clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding at 9 months after randomization. Results Owing to slow recruitment and low event rates, the trial was stopped prematurely after enrolment of 4005 of 6000 planned patients. Of 4000 patients included in the final analysis, 1997 received 6 months of clopidogrel and 2003 received 12 months. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (1.5%) assigned to 6 months of clopidogrel and 32 patients (1.6%) assigned to 12 months, observed difference â '0.1%, upper limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5%, limit of non-inferiority 2%, P for noninferiority <0.001. Stent thrombosis was observed in five patients (0.3%) assigned to 6 months of clopidogrel and three patients (0.2%) assigned to 12 months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, 95% CI: 0.40-6.96, P = 0.49. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding was observed in 4 patients (0.2%) assigned to 6 months clopidogrel and 5 patients (0.3%) assigned to 12 months; HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.21-2.98, P = 0.74. Conclusions In the present trial, characterized by low event rates, we did not observe a significant difference in net clinical outcome between 6 and 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after DES implantation. However, the results of the trial must be considered in view of its premature termination and lower than expected event rates. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00661206.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1252-1263
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume36
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 May 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Clopidogrel
  • Double-blind
  • Drug-eluting stent
  • Dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Randomized trial
  • Stent thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ISAR-SAFE: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stenting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this