Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is metabolic syndrome predictive of prevalence, extent, and risk of coronary artery disease beyond its components? results from the multinational coronary ct angiography evaluation for clinical outcome: An international multicenter registry (confirm)

  • Amir Ahmadi
  • , Jonathon Leipsic
  • , Gudrun Feuchtner
  • , Heidi Gransar
  • , Dan Kalra
  • , Ran Heo
  • , Stephan Achenbach
  • , Daniele Andreini
  • , Mouaz Al-Mallah
  • , Daniel S. Berman
  • , Matthew Budoff
  • , Filippo Cademartiri
  • , Tracy Q. Callister
  • , Hyuk Jae Chang
  • , Kavitha Chinnaiyan
  • , Benjamin Chow
  • , Ricardo C. Cury
  • , Augustin Delago
  • , Millie J. Gomez
  • , Martin Hadamitzky
  • Joerg Hausleiter, Niree Hindoyan, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Yong Jin Kim, Fay Lin, Erica Maffei, Gianluca Pontone, Gilbert L. Raff, Leslee J. Shaw, Todd C. Villines, Allison Dunning, James K. Min
  • University of British Columbia
  • Medical University Innsbruck
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • New York-Presbyterian Hospital
  • Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)
  • King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
  • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
  • Giovanni XXIII Hospital
  • Tennessee Heart and Vascular Institute
  • Yonsei University College of Medicine
  • William Beaumont Hospital
  • University of Ottawa
  • Baptist Neuroscience Institute
  • CCA
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • University Hospital Zurich
  • Seoul National University Hospital
  • Erasmus University Medical Center
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • Walter Reed Medical Center
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and events, its added prognostic value beyond its components remains unknown. This study compared the prevalence, severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), and prognosis of patients with metabolic syndrome to those with individual metabolic syndrome components. The study cohort consisted of 27125 consecutive individuals who underwent ≥64-detector row coronary CT angiography (CCTA) at 12 centers from 2003 to 2009. Metabolic syndrome was defined as per NCEP/ATP III criteria. Metabolic syndrome patients (n=690) were matched 1:1:1 to those with 1 component (n=690) and 2 components (n=690) of metabolic syndrome for age, sex, smoking status, and family history of premature CAD using propensity scoring. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined by a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome, mortality and late target vessel revascularization. Patients with 1 component of metabolic syndrome manifested lower rates of obstructive 1-, 2-, and 3-vessel/left main disease compared to metabolic syndrome patients (9.4% vs 13.8%, 2.6% vs 4.5%, and 1.0% vs 2.3%, respectively; p<0.05), while those with 2 components did not (10.5% vs 13.8%, 2.8% vs 4.5% and 1.3% vs 2.3%, respectively; p>0.05). At 2.5 years, metabolic syndrome patients experienced a higher rate of MACE compared to patients with 1 component (4.4% vs 1.6%; p=0.002), while no difference observed compared to individuals with 2 components (4.4% vs 3.2% p=0.25) of metabolic syndrome. In conclusion, Metabolic syndrome patients have significantly greater prevalence, severity, and prognosis of CAD compared to patients with 1 but not 2 components of metabolic syndrome.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0118998
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Mar 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is metabolic syndrome predictive of prevalence, extent, and risk of coronary artery disease beyond its components? results from the multinational coronary ct angiography evaluation for clinical outcome: An international multicenter registry (confirm)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this