Abstract
Studies show the inconclusive results regarding the relation between corporate social and environmental responsibility (CSR and CER) and expected returns. We argue that the reason for these mixed results is that the sustainability premium (i.e., the return difference of high-intensity minus low-intensity CSR/CER firms) is time-varying and correlated with investor sentiment. We find that high-intensity CSR (CER) firms have a monthly excess return that is 0.70 (0.88) p.p. higher following periods of low investor sentiment as compared to periods of high sentiment. Given that standard pricing factors cannot fully explain the abnormal returns caused by investor sentiment on the sustainability premium, we propose a sustainability pricing factor, estimated as the second principal component of portfolios sorted based on environmental and social variables, which corrects this mispricing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 600-621 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Asset Management |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Corporate environmental responsibility
- Corporate social responsibility
- Expected returns
- Financial performance
- Investor sentiment
- Sustainability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Investor sentiment and the time-varying sustainability premium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver