TY - CHAP
T1 - Investigating the cognitive processes involved in design ideation using psychological tests
AU - Campbell, Gerard
AU - Hay, Laura
AU - Duffy, Alex
AU - Lyall, Laura
AU - McTeague, Chris
AU - Vuletic, Tijana
AU - Grealy, Madeleine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/1/4
Y1 - 2023/1/4
N2 - The cognitive processes involved in design ideation remain poorly understood. To advance knowledge on this issue, we report a study in which 101 Product Design Engineering (PDE) students performed a series of ideation tasks as well as a range of psychological tests assessing different cognitive processes (semantic association, executive functioning, intelligence, mental imagery and divergent thinking). Relationships were then examined between ideation novelty and scores on the cognitive tests. Significant, positive correlations were observed between novelty and associative flexibility, general retrieval ability and fluid intelligence. A significant negative correlation was also found between novelty and inhibition. Finally, multiple regression analysis found that together, the cognitive processes assessed explained 26% of the variance in novelty scores within the sample. The implications of the findings are discussed, along with limitations and directions for future research.
AB - The cognitive processes involved in design ideation remain poorly understood. To advance knowledge on this issue, we report a study in which 101 Product Design Engineering (PDE) students performed a series of ideation tasks as well as a range of psychological tests assessing different cognitive processes (semantic association, executive functioning, intelligence, mental imagery and divergent thinking). Relationships were then examined between ideation novelty and scores on the cognitive tests. Significant, positive correlations were observed between novelty and associative flexibility, general retrieval ability and fluid intelligence. A significant negative correlation was also found between novelty and inhibition. Finally, multiple regression analysis found that together, the cognitive processes assessed explained 26% of the variance in novelty scores within the sample. The implications of the findings are discussed, along with limitations and directions for future research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194080380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-20418-0_12
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-20418-0_12
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85194080380
SN - 9783031204173
SP - 179
EP - 196
BT - Design Computing and Cognition'22
PB - Springer International Publishing
ER -