TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating optimal 2D hydrodynamic modeling of a recent flash flood in a steep Norwegian river using high-performance computing
AU - Moraru, Adina
AU - Rüther, Nils
AU - Bruland, Oddbjørn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors.
PY - 2023/9/1
Y1 - 2023/9/1
N2 - Efficient flood risk assessment and communication are essential for responding to increasingly recurrent flash floods. However, access to high-end data center computing is limited for stakeholders. This study evaluates the accuracy-speed trade-off of a hydraulic model by (i) assessing the potential acceleration of high-performance computing in PCs versus server-CPUs and GPUs, (ii) examining computing time evaluation and prediction indicators, and (iii) identifying variables controlling the computing time and their impact on the 2D hydrodynamic models’ accuracy using an actual flash flood event as a benchmark. GPU-computing is found to be 130× and 55× faster than standard and parallelized CPU-computing, respectively, saving up to 99.5% of the computing time. The model’s number of elements had the most significant impact, with,150,000 cells showing the best accuracy-speed trade-off. Using a PC equipped with a GPU enables almost real-time hydrodynamic information, democratizing flood data and facilitating interactive flood risk analysis.
AB - Efficient flood risk assessment and communication are essential for responding to increasingly recurrent flash floods. However, access to high-end data center computing is limited for stakeholders. This study evaluates the accuracy-speed trade-off of a hydraulic model by (i) assessing the potential acceleration of high-performance computing in PCs versus server-CPUs and GPUs, (ii) examining computing time evaluation and prediction indicators, and (iii) identifying variables controlling the computing time and their impact on the 2D hydrodynamic models’ accuracy using an actual flash flood event as a benchmark. GPU-computing is found to be 130× and 55× faster than standard and parallelized CPU-computing, respectively, saving up to 99.5% of the computing time. The model’s number of elements had the most significant impact, with,150,000 cells showing the best accuracy-speed trade-off. Using a PC equipped with a GPU enables almost real-time hydrodynamic information, democratizing flood data and facilitating interactive flood risk analysis.
KW - 2D hydrodynamic modeling
KW - flash flood modeling
KW - high-performance GPU-computing
KW - optimized hydraulic simulation
KW - sensitivity analysis
KW - steep rivers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174718199&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2166/hydro.2023.012
DO - 10.2166/hydro.2023.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85174718199
SN - 1464-7141
VL - 25
SP - 1690
EP - 1712
JO - Journal of Hydroinformatics
JF - Journal of Hydroinformatics
IS - 5
ER -