TY - GEN
T1 - Intention-detection strategies for upper limb exosuits
T2 - 8th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, BioRob 2020
AU - Lotti, Nicola
AU - Xiloyannis, Michele
AU - Missiroli, Francesco
AU - Chiaradia, Domenico
AU - Frisoli, Antonio
AU - Sanguineti, Vittorio
AU - Masia, Lorenzo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - The cognitive human-robot interaction between an exosuit and its wearer plays a key role in determining both the biomechanical effects of the device on movements and its perceived effectiveness. There is a lack of evidence, however, on the comparative performance of different control methods, implemented on the same device. Here, we compare two different control approaches on the same robotic suit: a model-based myoelectric control (myoprocessor), which estimates the joint torque from the activation of target muscles, and a dynamic-based control that provides support against gravity using an inverse dynamic model. Tested on a cohort of four healthy participants, assistance from the exosuit results in a marked reduction in the effort of muscles working against gravity with both control approaches (peak reduction of 68.6±18.8%, for the dynamic arm model and 62.4±25.1% for the myoprocessor), when compared to an unpowered condition. Neither of the two controllers had an affect on the performance of their users in a joint-angle tracking task (peak errors of 15.4° and 16.4° for the dynamic arm model and myoprocessor, respectively, compared to 13.1o in the unpowered condition). However, our results highlight the remarkable adaptability of the myoprocessor to seamlessly adapt to changing external dynamics.
AB - The cognitive human-robot interaction between an exosuit and its wearer plays a key role in determining both the biomechanical effects of the device on movements and its perceived effectiveness. There is a lack of evidence, however, on the comparative performance of different control methods, implemented on the same device. Here, we compare two different control approaches on the same robotic suit: a model-based myoelectric control (myoprocessor), which estimates the joint torque from the activation of target muscles, and a dynamic-based control that provides support against gravity using an inverse dynamic model. Tested on a cohort of four healthy participants, assistance from the exosuit results in a marked reduction in the effort of muscles working against gravity with both control approaches (peak reduction of 68.6±18.8%, for the dynamic arm model and 62.4±25.1% for the myoprocessor), when compared to an unpowered condition. Neither of the two controllers had an affect on the performance of their users in a joint-angle tracking task (peak errors of 15.4° and 16.4° for the dynamic arm model and myoprocessor, respectively, compared to 13.1o in the unpowered condition). However, our results highlight the remarkable adaptability of the myoprocessor to seamlessly adapt to changing external dynamics.
KW - Human-machine interfaces
KW - Soft robotics
KW - Wearable technologies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095586426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/BioRob49111.2020.9224284
DO - 10.1109/BioRob49111.2020.9224284
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85095586426
T3 - Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics
SP - 410
EP - 415
BT - 2020 8th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, BioRob 2020
PB - IEEE Computer Society
Y2 - 29 November 2020 through 1 December 2020
ER -