Influence of the input system (Conventional versus organic farming) on metabolite profiles of maize (Zea mays) kernels

Richard M. Röhlig, Karl Heinz Engel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays) kernels grown conventionally and organically, respectively, were investigated using a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS)-based metabolite profiling methodology. By analysis of three cultivars grown at two locations with different input systems and at a third location where both organic and conventional farming were applied, the impact of the growing regime on the metabolite spectrum should be put into the context of natural variability. The applied analytical approach involved consecutive extraction of freeze-dried maize flour and subsequent subfractionation. Approximately 300 compounds from a broad spectrum of chemical classes were detected, of which 167 were identified. The metabolite profiling data were statistically assessed via principal component analysis (PCA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The PCA demonstrated that the observed separations were mainly due to genetic differences (cultivars) and environmental influences. The different input systems (conventional/organic) only led to minor differentiations. ANOVA and quantification of selected constituents confirmed these observations. Only three metabolites (malic acid, myo-inositol, and phosphate) were consistently different because of the employed input system if samples from all field trials were considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3022-3030
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of agricultural and food chemistry
Volume58
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Mar 2010

Keywords

  • Conventional farming
  • GC/MS
  • Input system
  • Metabolite profiling
  • Organic farming
  • Zea mays

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of the input system (Conventional versus organic farming) on metabolite profiles of maize (Zea mays) kernels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this