Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Individualisiertes Brustkrebsrisiko – wie berechnen, wie bewerten und wie besprechen?

Translated title of the contribution: Individualized risk of breast cancer—How should it be calculated, evaluated and discussed?
  • Technical University of Munich
  • University of Munich
  • Heidelberg University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

There has been a lot of controversy about the mammography screening program. Screening recommendations for breast cancer in the general population are currently based solely on the age of an individual, despite the fact that additional genetic and non-genetic factors are known to influence cancer risk. Recent breast cancer risk models include these factors. They allow the implication of a risk-adapted screening approach, “mammography screening 2.0”. On the one hand there is a need to intensify diagnostic procedures for women at higher risk but on the other hand it is desirable to avoid unnecessary diagnostic procedures in women who are unlikely to develop breast cancer. The aim is to improve the efficiency of the screening program and to help guide screening decisions by including patients’ individual risk profiles and preferences; however, the implementation of such a strategy faces new challenges, such as the particular prediction model to use, the ways to evaluate and to communicate risks in the screening context.

Translated title of the contributionIndividualized risk of breast cancer—How should it be calculated, evaluated and discussed?
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)397-402
Number of pages6
JournalGynakologe
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Individualized risk of breast cancer—How should it be calculated, evaluated and discussed?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this