TY - JOUR
T1 - Individual Patient Data Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials of Bivalirudin versus Heparin in Acute Myocardial Infarction
T2 - Rationale and Methodology
AU - Bikdeli, Behnood
AU - McAndrew, Thomas
AU - Crowley, Aaron
AU - Chen, Shmuel
AU - Mehdipoor, Ghazaleh
AU - Redfors, Björn
AU - Liu, Yangbo
AU - Zhang, Zixuan
AU - Liu, Mengdan
AU - Zhang, Yiran
AU - Francese, Dominic P.
AU - Erlinge, David
AU - James, Stefan K.
AU - Han, Yaling
AU - Li, Yi
AU - Kastrati, Adnan
AU - Schüpke, Stefanie
AU - Stables, Rod H.
AU - Shahzad, Adeel
AU - Steg, Philippe Gabriel
AU - Goldstein, Patrick
AU - Frigoli, Enrico
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - Valgimigli, Marco
AU - Stone, Gregg W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background Individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of periprocedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have reported conflicting results. Study-level meta-analyses lack granularity to adjust for confounders, explore heterogeneity, or identify subgroups that may particularly benefit or be harmed. Objective To overcome these limitations, we sought to develop an individual patient-data pooled database of RCTs comparing bivalirudin versus heparin. Methods We conducted a systematic review to identify RCTs in which ≥1,000 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing PCI were randomized to bivalirudin versus heparin. Results From 738 identified studies, 8 RCTs met the prespecified criteria. The principal investigators of each study agreed to provide patient-level data. The data were pooled and checked for accuracy against trial publications, with discrepancies addressed by consulting with the trialists. Consensus-based definitions were created to resolve differing antithrombotic, procedural, and outcome definitions. The project required 3.5 years to complete, and the final database includes 27,409 patients (13,346 randomized to bivalirudin and 14,063 randomized to heparin). Conclusion We have created a large individual patient database of bivalirudin versus heparin RCTs in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. This endeavor may help identify the optimal periprocedural anticoagulation regimen for patient groups with different relative risks of adverse ischemic versus bleeding events, including those with ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation MI, radial versus femoral access, use of a prolonged bivalirudin infusion or glycoprotein inhibitors, and others. Adherence to standardized techniques and rigorous validation processes should increase confidence in the accuracy and robustness of the results.
AB - Background Individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of periprocedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have reported conflicting results. Study-level meta-analyses lack granularity to adjust for confounders, explore heterogeneity, or identify subgroups that may particularly benefit or be harmed. Objective To overcome these limitations, we sought to develop an individual patient-data pooled database of RCTs comparing bivalirudin versus heparin. Methods We conducted a systematic review to identify RCTs in which ≥1,000 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing PCI were randomized to bivalirudin versus heparin. Results From 738 identified studies, 8 RCTs met the prespecified criteria. The principal investigators of each study agreed to provide patient-level data. The data were pooled and checked for accuracy against trial publications, with discrepancies addressed by consulting with the trialists. Consensus-based definitions were created to resolve differing antithrombotic, procedural, and outcome definitions. The project required 3.5 years to complete, and the final database includes 27,409 patients (13,346 randomized to bivalirudin and 14,063 randomized to heparin). Conclusion We have created a large individual patient database of bivalirudin versus heparin RCTs in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. This endeavor may help identify the optimal periprocedural anticoagulation regimen for patient groups with different relative risks of adverse ischemic versus bleeding events, including those with ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation MI, radial versus femoral access, use of a prolonged bivalirudin infusion or glycoprotein inhibitors, and others. Adherence to standardized techniques and rigorous validation processes should increase confidence in the accuracy and robustness of the results.
KW - acute myocardial infarction
KW - bivalirudin
KW - heparin
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - pooled analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078870503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0039-1700872
DO - 10.1055/s-0039-1700872
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31820428
AN - SCOPUS:85078870503
SN - 0340-6245
VL - 120
SP - 348
EP - 362
JO - Thrombosis and Haemostasis
JF - Thrombosis and Haemostasis
IS - 2
ER -