Indication in psychotherapy on the basis of a follow-up study

The problem of indication is a central one of psychotherapy research. Unfortunately up to now only few scientific results contribute to a therapist's decision in selecting patients for a specific therapeutic setting. Thus, indication and outcome research should be combined. A critical view on traditional research strategies demonstrates that psychotherapy research should replace the ideal of normative and general rules by the rational investigation of one's own therapeutic practice. From this point of view some results of the Heidelberg Follow-Up Project of 110 psychotherapies which were started on an inpatient and continued on an outpatient basis are presented. Based on the therapeutic changes of these 110 patients the question is investigated whether the decisions of the indications correspond with the therapeutic goals of the treatment models. Moreover, the question is discussed what kind of success a specific treatment model offers for 'problem patients'.