TY - GEN
T1 - Improving the verification process of video quality metrics
AU - Keimel, Christian
AU - Oelbaum, Tobias
AU - Diepold, Klaus
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The most important step in the development process of a video quality metric is its verification with regards to the subjective quality experience. Even though guidelines in the form of standards and recommendations are well known, there are still quite often shortcomings in the verification process of many metrics. In this contribution we revisit these rules, point out important details and review contributions to video quality metrics for typical shortcomings. We will highlight in detail five steps that should be followed in order to improve the overall quality of the verification process of video quality metrics: using a large and diverse data base, planing and conducting subjective tests carefully, using different data for calibration and verification of a metric, avoiding unnecessary data fitting steps, and a clear and meaningful presentation of the results. Also we will provide short examples how an improper verification might affect the results of a video quality metric.
AB - The most important step in the development process of a video quality metric is its verification with regards to the subjective quality experience. Even though guidelines in the form of standards and recommendations are well known, there are still quite often shortcomings in the verification process of many metrics. In this contribution we revisit these rules, point out important details and review contributions to video quality metrics for typical shortcomings. We will highlight in detail five steps that should be followed in order to improve the overall quality of the verification process of video quality metrics: using a large and diverse data base, planing and conducting subjective tests carefully, using different data for calibration and verification of a metric, avoiding unnecessary data fitting steps, and a clear and meaningful presentation of the results. Also we will provide short examples how an improper verification might affect the results of a video quality metric.
KW - Cross verification
KW - Video quality metric
KW - Visual quality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350770991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/QOMEX.2009.5246966
DO - 10.1109/QOMEX.2009.5246966
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:70350770991
SN - 9781424443703
T3 - 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEx 2009
SP - 121
EP - 126
BT - 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEx 2009
T2 - 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEx 2009
Y2 - 29 July 2009 through 31 July 2009
ER -