Improving the verification process of video quality metrics

Christian Keimel, Tobias Oelbaum, Klaus Diepold

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

The most important step in the development process of a video quality metric is its verification with regards to the subjective quality experience. Even though guidelines in the form of standards and recommendations are well known, there are still quite often shortcomings in the verification process of many metrics. In this contribution we revisit these rules, point out important details and review contributions to video quality metrics for typical shortcomings. We will highlight in detail five steps that should be followed in order to improve the overall quality of the verification process of video quality metrics: using a large and diverse data base, planing and conducting subjective tests carefully, using different data for calibration and verification of a metric, avoiding unnecessary data fitting steps, and a clear and meaningful presentation of the results. Also we will provide short examples how an improper verification might affect the results of a video quality metric.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEx 2009
Pages121-126
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Event2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEx 2009 - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: 29 Jul 200931 Jul 2009

Publication series

Name2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEx 2009

Conference

Conference2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEx 2009
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period29/07/0931/07/09

Keywords

  • Cross verification
  • Video quality metric
  • Visual quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the verification process of video quality metrics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this