Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Implicit/Explicit Motive Discrepancies and Volitional Depletion among Managers

  • University of Munich
  • Macquarie University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

178 Scopus citations

Abstract

The compensatory model of motivation and volition is based on the assumption that discrepancies between implicit and explicit motives lead to psychological conflict, and that resolution of this conflict requires volitional regulation and consumes volitional strength. This suggests that implicit/explicit motive discrepancies (IED) are responsible for decreases in volitional strength. A longitudinal field study with 82 managers was conducted to test this proposition. Results show that IED longitudinally predicted decreases in volitional strength. Furthermore, structural equation modeling revealed that volitional strength mediated the relation between IED and impaired subjective well-being. The theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed, particularly with respect to volitional depletion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-327
Number of pages13
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Explicit motives
  • Implicit motives
  • Motive discrepancies
  • Subjective well-being
  • Volitional strength

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implicit/Explicit Motive Discrepancies and Volitional Depletion among Managers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this