TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on staging and management of prostate cancer patients in various clinical settings
T2 - A prospective single center study
AU - Sonni, Ida
AU - Eiber, Matthias
AU - Fendler, Wolfgang P.
AU - Alano, Rejah M.
AU - Vangala, Sitaram S.
AU - Kishan, Amar U.
AU - Nickols, Nicholas
AU - Rettig, Matthew B.
AU - Reiter, Robert E.
AU - Czernin, Johannes
AU - Calais, Jeremie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - The impact of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT on management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) is well-established. However, whether and how PSMA PET/CT affects the management of patients undergoing scans for other clinical indications remains unknown. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on initial and subsequent management decisions in a cohort of PCa patients referred for various indications (“basket trial”) excluding the two main classical indications: BCR and presurgical staging. Methods: This was a prospective study of 197 patients that aimed to determine the impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on PCa stage and management. Indications for PSMA PET/CT were: initial staging of non-surgical candidates (30 patients) and re-staging after definitive treatment (n=168). The re-staging cohort comprised: patients re-staged with known advanced metastatic disease (n=103), after androgen deprivation therapy only (n=16), after surgery with serum PSA levels <0.2 ng/ml (n=13), after radiation therapy (RT) not meeting the Phoenix criteria (n=22) and after other primary local treatments [i.e. high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), focal laser ablation, cryoablation, hyperthermia or irreversible electroporation] (n=13). Patients with BCR and candidates for curative surgery were excluded. Impact on management was assessed using pre- and post-PET questionnaires completed by referring physicians, electronic chart review and/or patient telephone encounters. Results: PSMA PET/CT changed disease stage in 135/197 (69%) patients (38% up-stage, 30% down-stage and no changes in stage in 32%). Management was affected in 104/182 (57%) patients. Specifically, PSMA PET/CT impacted management of patients who were re-staged after RT without meeting the Phoenix criteria for BCR, after other definitive local treatments and with advanced metastatic disease in 13/18 (72%), 8/12 (67%) and 59/96 (61%), respectively. Conclusions: PSMA PET/CT has a profound impact on stage and management of PCa patients outside of the two main classical indications (BCR and presurgical staging) across all examined clinical scenarios.
AB - The impact of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT on management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) is well-established. However, whether and how PSMA PET/CT affects the management of patients undergoing scans for other clinical indications remains unknown. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on initial and subsequent management decisions in a cohort of PCa patients referred for various indications (“basket trial”) excluding the two main classical indications: BCR and presurgical staging. Methods: This was a prospective study of 197 patients that aimed to determine the impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on PCa stage and management. Indications for PSMA PET/CT were: initial staging of non-surgical candidates (30 patients) and re-staging after definitive treatment (n=168). The re-staging cohort comprised: patients re-staged with known advanced metastatic disease (n=103), after androgen deprivation therapy only (n=16), after surgery with serum PSA levels <0.2 ng/ml (n=13), after radiation therapy (RT) not meeting the Phoenix criteria (n=22) and after other primary local treatments [i.e. high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), focal laser ablation, cryoablation, hyperthermia or irreversible electroporation] (n=13). Patients with BCR and candidates for curative surgery were excluded. Impact on management was assessed using pre- and post-PET questionnaires completed by referring physicians, electronic chart review and/or patient telephone encounters. Results: PSMA PET/CT changed disease stage in 135/197 (69%) patients (38% up-stage, 30% down-stage and no changes in stage in 32%). Management was affected in 104/182 (57%) patients. Specifically, PSMA PET/CT impacted management of patients who were re-staged after RT without meeting the Phoenix criteria for BCR, after other definitive local treatments and with advanced metastatic disease in 13/18 (72%), 8/12 (67%) and 59/96 (61%), respectively. Conclusions: PSMA PET/CT has a profound impact on stage and management of PCa patients outside of the two main classical indications (BCR and presurgical staging) across all examined clinical scenarios.
KW - Impact on management
KW - PSMA PET
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Re-staging
KW - Staging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085108401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2967/JNUMED.119.237602
DO - 10.2967/JNUMED.119.237602
M3 - Article
C2 - 31924715
AN - SCOPUS:85085108401
SN - 0161-5505
VL - 61
JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
IS - 8
M1 - 237602
ER -