TY - JOUR
T1 - Immunohistochemical characterization of the perivascular infiltrate in tissues adjacent to stainless steel implants compared with titanium implants
AU - Thewes, M.
AU - Kretschmer, R.
AU - Gfesser, M.
AU - Rakoski, J.
AU - Nerlich, M.
AU - Borelli, S.
AU - Ring, J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank Mrs. S. Bogner for excellent technical assistance. The work was supported by AO Forschungskom-mission, Davos, Switzerland.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Metallic orthopaedics implants are composed of elements that are known to be skin sensitizers in the general population. In this study, we analyzed the cells of perivascular infiltration in the tissue adjacent to titanium (n = 23) and steel (n = 8) implants after explantation of the metals by immunohistochemical methods. The following panel of monoclonal antibodies were used as parameters: CD 1a (Langerhans cells), CD 4 (T-helper cells), CD 8 (T-suppressor cells), CD 11c (monocytes and macrophages), CD 45 RO (memory cells), CD 45 RA (naive cells), eosinophil cationic proteins (ECP), neutrophil elastase, and HLA-DR. The number of perivascular total cells did not differ significantly. All cells were identified in both metal subgroups, but a statistical difference was not seen in the above-mentioned parameters. We conclude that sensitization to metals is possible in the tissue adjacent to steel and titanium implants, because all cells which play an important role in allergic delayed-type hypersensitivity (type IV) reactions are present. This phenomenon may be called a 'pre-sensitization' phase, because no sensitization or allergic reactions were seen in our cases. Second, in the present study, a statistical difference was not seen in the number of infiltrate cells in the tissue adjacent to steel compared with titanium implants.
AB - Metallic orthopaedics implants are composed of elements that are known to be skin sensitizers in the general population. In this study, we analyzed the cells of perivascular infiltration in the tissue adjacent to titanium (n = 23) and steel (n = 8) implants after explantation of the metals by immunohistochemical methods. The following panel of monoclonal antibodies were used as parameters: CD 1a (Langerhans cells), CD 4 (T-helper cells), CD 8 (T-suppressor cells), CD 11c (monocytes and macrophages), CD 45 RO (memory cells), CD 45 RA (naive cells), eosinophil cationic proteins (ECP), neutrophil elastase, and HLA-DR. The number of perivascular total cells did not differ significantly. All cells were identified in both metal subgroups, but a statistical difference was not seen in the above-mentioned parameters. We conclude that sensitization to metals is possible in the tissue adjacent to steel and titanium implants, because all cells which play an important role in allergic delayed-type hypersensitivity (type IV) reactions are present. This phenomenon may be called a 'pre-sensitization' phase, because no sensitization or allergic reactions were seen in our cases. Second, in the present study, a statistical difference was not seen in the number of infiltrate cells in the tissue adjacent to steel compared with titanium implants.
KW - Immunohistochemistry
KW - Steel implant
KW - Titanium implant
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0035079773
U2 - 10.1007/s004020000230
DO - 10.1007/s004020000230
M3 - Article
C2 - 11317685
AN - SCOPUS:0035079773
SN - 0936-8051
VL - 121
SP - 223
EP - 226
JO - Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
JF - Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
IS - 4
ER -