Imaginary carrot or effective fertiliser? A rejoinder on funding and productivity

Rachel Heyard, Tobias Philipp, Hanna Hottenrott

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

The question of whether and to what extent research funding enables researchers to be more productive is a crucial one. In their recent work, Mariethoz et al. (Scientometrics, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03.855-1) claim that there is no significant relationship between project-based research funding and bibliometric productivity measures and conclude that this is the result of inappropriate allocation mechanisms. In this rejoinder, we argue that such claims are not supported by the data and analyses reported in the article.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9333-9338
Number of pages6
JournalScientometrics
Volume126
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Publication metrics
  • Research funding allocation
  • Research productivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imaginary carrot or effective fertiliser? A rejoinder on funding and productivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this