TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of five Listeria species based on infrared spectra (FTIR) using macrosamples is superior to a microsample approach
AU - Rebuffo-Scheer, Cecilia A.
AU - Dietrich, Jochen
AU - Wenning, Mareike
AU - Scherer, Siegfried
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgement This work was supported in part by the FEI (Forschungskreis der Ernährungsindustrie e. V., Bonn), the AiF (Arbeitskreis für industrielle Forschung), and the Ministry of Economics and Technology, project no. 14126N.
PY - 2008/3
Y1 - 2008/3
N2 - Microorganisms can be identified using both macrosamples and microsamples based on infrared spectra (FTIR). This work compares the identification of the five closely related Listeria species L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. monocytogenes, L. seeligeri, and L. welshimeri using both methods. The overall identification success for 25 strains was 92.8% for the former and 79.2% for the latter methods, respectively. The worst performances of the microsample method were obtained for L. innocua, L. ivanovii, and L. monocytogenes, while L. seeligeri and L. welshimeri did not show significant differences between the techniques. Identification success was mainly influenced by the age of the cells and the spatial heterogeneity of the microcolonies, as analyzed by the microsample method. Spectra of Listeria cells near the stationary phase exhibited more species-specific markers and thus allowed for better discrimination than spectra of growing cells. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of cell composition at different locations in microcolonies of L. innocua, L. ivanovii and L. monocytogenes resulted in limited discrimination success of the microsample method. We conclude that, at least in the case of Listeria, the macrosample method is superior to the microsample method, although the latter is the faster technique.
AB - Microorganisms can be identified using both macrosamples and microsamples based on infrared spectra (FTIR). This work compares the identification of the five closely related Listeria species L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. monocytogenes, L. seeligeri, and L. welshimeri using both methods. The overall identification success for 25 strains was 92.8% for the former and 79.2% for the latter methods, respectively. The worst performances of the microsample method were obtained for L. innocua, L. ivanovii, and L. monocytogenes, while L. seeligeri and L. welshimeri did not show significant differences between the techniques. Identification success was mainly influenced by the age of the cells and the spatial heterogeneity of the microcolonies, as analyzed by the microsample method. Spectra of Listeria cells near the stationary phase exhibited more species-specific markers and thus allowed for better discrimination than spectra of growing cells. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of cell composition at different locations in microcolonies of L. innocua, L. ivanovii and L. monocytogenes resulted in limited discrimination success of the microsample method. We conclude that, at least in the case of Listeria, the macrosample method is superior to the microsample method, although the latter is the faster technique.
KW - FTIR macrosample method
KW - FTIR microsample method
KW - Listeria monocytogenes
KW - Listeria species
KW - Species identification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149109516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00216-008-1834-1
DO - 10.1007/s00216-008-1834-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 18231779
AN - SCOPUS:41149109516
SN - 1618-2642
VL - 390
SP - 1629
EP - 1635
JO - Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
JF - Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
IS - 6
ER -