TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of aero-acoustic scattering matrices from large eddy simulation
T2 - Application to whistling orifices in duct
AU - Lacombe, R.
AU - Föller, S.
AU - Jasor, G.
AU - Polifke, W.
AU - Aurégan, Y.
AU - Moussou, P.
PY - 2013/9/30
Y1 - 2013/9/30
N2 - The identification of the aero-acoustic scattering matrix of an orifice in a duct is achieved by computational fluid dynamics. The methodology first consists in performing a large eddy simulation of a turbulent compressible flow, with superimposed broadband acoustic excitations. After extracting time series of acoustic data with a specific filter, system identification techniques are applied. They allow us to determine the components of the acoustic scattering matrix of the orifice. Following the same procedure, a previous paper determines the scattering features of a sudden area expansion. In the present paper, the focus is on whistling orifices. The whistling ability of the tested orifice is evaluated by deriving the acoustic power balance from the scattering matrix. Comparisons with experiments at two different Mach numbers show a good agreement. The potential whistling frequency range is well predicted in terms of frequency and amplitude.
AB - The identification of the aero-acoustic scattering matrix of an orifice in a duct is achieved by computational fluid dynamics. The methodology first consists in performing a large eddy simulation of a turbulent compressible flow, with superimposed broadband acoustic excitations. After extracting time series of acoustic data with a specific filter, system identification techniques are applied. They allow us to determine the components of the acoustic scattering matrix of the orifice. Following the same procedure, a previous paper determines the scattering features of a sudden area expansion. In the present paper, the focus is on whistling orifices. The whistling ability of the tested orifice is evaluated by deriving the acoustic power balance from the scattering matrix. Comparisons with experiments at two different Mach numbers show a good agreement. The potential whistling frequency range is well predicted in terms of frequency and amplitude.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879943680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.04.036
DO - 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.04.036
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84879943680
SN - 0022-460X
VL - 332
SP - 5059
EP - 5067
JO - Journal of Sound and Vibration
JF - Journal of Sound and Vibration
IS - 20
ER -