Hydrogen on W(100): temperature dependence of LEED and angle-resolved ESD

R. Jaeger, D. Menzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

For hydrogen adsorption on W(100), the evolution of the c(2 × 2) LEED intensities and of the H+ ESD signal with H coverage have been investigated for various adsorption and annealing temperatures. Striking changes have been found for the half-order LEED intensities in the temperature range 140–360 K, in agreement with other workers, where the H+ signal showed only minor differences. The maxima of the LEED and the ESD intensities, however, occurred at the same exposure throughout this range (≈25% of saturation coverage). A temperature dependent variation of the height of the H+ maximum was observed which was reversible up to the desorption temperature of the β2 hydrogen phase. The H+ ESDIAD lobe was found to have a polar FWHM of about 21°, independent of temperature between 140 and 450 K, and without any azimuthal dependence. These results provide evidence for the assumption that the observable H+ ions desorb from reconstructed sites. The number of these sites depends on temperature and hydrogen coverage, as shown by the change of the H+ current with these parameters. The transition from H on reconstructed to H on unreconstructed sites is of the order-order type; the energy difference between the two different adsorbate situations is about 135 meV/site at the quarter coverage. The consistency of the results and conclusions with a bridge-site model for H adsorption is shown. Elastic interactions lead to agglomeration of adsorbed H. The azimuthal isotropy of the ESDIAD lobes is interpreted by a superposition of emission from various types of bridge-sites which smear out the anisotropy expected for individual bridge-sites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)561-580
Number of pages20
JournalSurface Science
Volume100
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1980

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hydrogen on W(100): temperature dependence of LEED and angle-resolved ESD'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this