TY - JOUR
T1 - "How to speak to your psychiatrist"
T2 - Shared decision-making training for inpatients with schizophrenia
AU - Hamann, Johannes
AU - Mendel, Rosmarie
AU - Meier, Anna
AU - Asani, Florim
AU - Pausch, Esther
AU - Leucht, Stefan
AU - Kissling, Werner
PY - 2011/10
Y1 - 2011/10
N2 - Objective: Involving patients with mental illness in shared decision making about their treatment has recently attracted attention, but existing interventions may insufficiently motivate or enable patients with schizophrenia to behave more actively. This study evaluated a new intervention. Methods: In a pilot study 61 inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from a psychiatric hospital in Germany were randomly assigned to receive shared decision-making training (N=32) or cognitive training (N=29, control condition). Results: The shared decision-making training yielded higher participation preferences and increased patients' desire to have more responsibility in treatment decisions, which continued to the sixmonth follow-up. Patients in the intervention group became more skeptical of treatment and were perceived as more "difficult" by their psychiatrists. Conclusions: Training in shared decision making was highly accepted by patients and changed attitudes towardparticipation in decisionmaking. There were some hints that it might generate beneficial long-term effects.
AB - Objective: Involving patients with mental illness in shared decision making about their treatment has recently attracted attention, but existing interventions may insufficiently motivate or enable patients with schizophrenia to behave more actively. This study evaluated a new intervention. Methods: In a pilot study 61 inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from a psychiatric hospital in Germany were randomly assigned to receive shared decision-making training (N=32) or cognitive training (N=29, control condition). Results: The shared decision-making training yielded higher participation preferences and increased patients' desire to have more responsibility in treatment decisions, which continued to the sixmonth follow-up. Patients in the intervention group became more skeptical of treatment and were perceived as more "difficult" by their psychiatrists. Conclusions: Training in shared decision making was highly accepted by patients and changed attitudes towardparticipation in decisionmaking. There were some hints that it might generate beneficial long-term effects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054851420&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1176/ps.62.10.pss6210_1218
DO - 10.1176/ps.62.10.pss6210_1218
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80054851420
SN - 1075-2730
VL - 62
SP - 1218
EP - 1221
JO - Psychiatric Services
JF - Psychiatric Services
IS - 10
ER -