How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses

S. Leucht, W. Kissling, J. M. Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective : Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are increasingly frequently used in the evaluation of medical treatments. This review explains the principles of the methodology, significance and limitations of systematic reviews. Method: Short review article. Results: In contrast to conventional reviews, systematic reviews use a structured approach in retrieving, analyzing and interpreting the evidence. A comprehensive search strategy is applied to identify all relevant trials. Study selection and data extraction is performed independently by at least two reviewers. The data are usually synthesized in a meta-analysis applying statistical methods to examine homogeneity. Funnel plots and other statistical methods are applied to detect publication bias. Conclusion: Due to the enormous amount of scientific information published every year, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become indispensable methods for the evaluation of medical treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-450
Number of pages8
JournalActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Volume119
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • Meta-analysis
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this