How the influence of the implicit power motive on negotiation performance can be neutralized by a conflicting explicit affiliation motive

Julia K. Trapp, Hugo M. Kehr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examined the impact of the implicit power motive on negotiation performance. Further, we examined the long-held notion that an aroused implicit motive's influence can be neutralized by a conflicting explicit motive. In two experiments with student samples, participants engaged in simulated salary negotiations against a fictitious opponent. Negotiation performance was assessed with participants' salary requests. As predicted, results indicated a positive impact of the implicit power motive on negotiation performance, regardless of whether the implicit power motive was measured (Experiment 1, N = 65) or manipulated (Experiment 2, N = 96). In addition, Experiment 2 confirmed that the effects of the aroused implicit power motive were neutralized when the explicit affiliation motive had been activated prior to negotiation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-162
Number of pages4
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume94
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2016

Keywords

  • Affiliation motive
  • Explicit motive
  • Implicit motive
  • Intraindividual conflict
  • Negotiation performance
  • Power motive
  • Salary negotiation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How the influence of the implicit power motive on negotiation performance can be neutralized by a conflicting explicit affiliation motive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this