Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the technical advancements of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure, valve embolisation into the left ventricle remains a challenging situation requiring expedited management through the Heart Team. INVESTIGATION: The advantages and pitfalls of an interventional transfemoral approach, a transapical extraction of the dislocated prosthesis or the conversion to open heart surgery have to be balanced depending on the overall situation and the specific characteristics of the patient. DIAGNOSIS: A transfemoral approach would be the first choice for most TAVI implanters. We discuss the different options and present an elegant solution solving this challenging situation, leading to a good immediate and longterm outcome. MANAGEMENT: Attempts at pulling the prosthesis out of the ventricle using a balloon remained unsuccessful. After grasping of the prosthesis with a goose-neck snare, the valve was pulled into the annulus. A second SAPIEN XT prosthesis was implanted and fixed the first prosthesis within the annulus. After post-dilatation, there was a good result without relevant gradient and minimal aortic regurgitation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1370-1372 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | EuroIntervention |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Aortic stenosis
- Bail-out
- Percutaneous valve
- Retrieval
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How should I treat dislocation of a TAVI SAPIEN prosthesis into the left ventricle?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver