Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How sensitive are ecosystem services in European forest landscapes to silvicultural treatment?

  • Peter Biber
  • , José G. Borges
  • , Ralf Moshammer
  • , Susana Barreiro
  • , Brigite Botequim
  • , Yvonne Brodrechtová
  • , Vilis Brukas
  • , Gherardo Chirici
  • , Rebeca Cordero-Debets
  • , Edwin Corrigan
  • , Ljusk Ola Eriksson
  • , Matteo Favero
  • , Emil Galev
  • , Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo
  • , Geerten Hengeveld
  • , Marius Kavaliauskas
  • , Marco Marchetti
  • , Susete Marques
  • , Gintautas Mozgeris
  • , Rudolf Navrátil
  • Maarten Nieuwenhuis, Christophe Orazio, Ivan Paligorov, Davide Pettenella, Róbert Sedmák, Róbert Smreček, Andrius Stanislovaitis, Margarida Tomé, Renats Trubins, Ján Tuček, Matteo Vizzarri, Ida Wallin, Hans Pretzsch, Ola Sallnäs
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa
  • Technical University in Zvolen
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • University of Florence
  • Atlantic European Regional Office of the European Forest Institute-EFIATLANTIC
  • University of Padova
  • University of Forestry
  • Wageningen University and Research Centre
  • Aleksandras Stulginskis University
  • University of Molise
  • Czech University of Life Sciences Prague

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

124 Scopus citations

Abstract

While sustainable forestry in Europe is characterized by the provision of a multitude of forest ecosystem services, there exists no comprehensive study that scrutinizes their sensitivity to forest management on a pan-European scale, so far. We compile scenario runs from regionally tailored forest growth models and Decision Support Systems (DSS) from 20 case studies throughout Europe and analyze whether the ecosystem service provision depends on management intensity and other co-variables, comprising regional affiliation, social environment, and tree species composition. The simulation runs provide information about the case-specifically most important ecosystem services in terms of appropriate indicators. We found a strong positive correlation between management intensity and wood production, but only weak correlation with protective and socioeconomic forest functions. Interestingly, depending on the forest region, we found that biodiversity can react in both ways, positively and negatively, to increased management intensity. Thus, it may be in tradeoff or in synergy with wood production and forest resource maintenance. The covariables species composition and social environment are of punctual interest only, while the affiliation to a certain region often makes an important difference in terms of an ecosystem service's treatment sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1666-1695
Number of pages30
JournalForests
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Ecosystem services
  • European forests
  • Scenario analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How sensitive are ecosystem services in European forest landscapes to silvicultural treatment?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this