How many patents are truly valid? Extent, causes, and remedies for latent patent invalidity

Joachim Henkel, Hans Zischka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

A substantial number of patents tested in court for validity are invalidated. If a similar portion of all patents was deemed invalid in hypothetical validity tests, then this would indicate a seriously flawed patent system due to restrictions unduly imposed by these erroneously granted patents on users and follow-on innovators. Thus, we ask, if a randomly picked patent underwent revocation proceedings, what are the odds of its invalidation? We address this question by analyzing the various selection effects through which patents become subject to validity decisions. Empirically, we focus on Germany, where revocation proceedings are separate from infringement suits and where, in court decisions during the period of 2010–2012, 45% of patents were determined to be fully invalid and 33% to be partially invalid. Based on data gleaned through expert interviews, a survey among lawyers, and an econometric analysis of court judgments, we find the likelihood of (hypothetical) invalidation of a randomly picked patent to be in the same range as that for actually adjudicated patents. As the main cause of patent invalidity we identify incomplete searches for prior art during examination. Our arguments carry over to other legislations. To remedy this situation, we suggest a significant increase of the inventive step required for patent grant combined with a smaller increase of the inventive-step standard in litigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-239
Number of pages45
JournalEuropean Journal of Law and Economics
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Oct 2019

Keywords

  • Innovation
  • Inventive step
  • Litigation
  • Patent
  • Patent validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How many patents are truly valid? Extent, causes, and remedies for latent patent invalidity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this