TY - JOUR
T1 - (How) Does discretion change over time? A contribution toward a dynamic view of managerial discretion
AU - Hutzschenreuter, Thomas
AU - Kleindienst, Ingo
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - A quarter of a century ago Hambrick and Finkelstein (1987) called for work on the dynamics of managerial discretion. The present paper aims at developing ideas of such a dynamic view by integrating insights from research on cognition and learning into discretion theory, complementing established research on the role of context with a view that focuses on the manager as the driving force of discretion. We conceptualize discretion as the scope of options a manager may choose from. Accordingly, the cognitive concepts of awareness and attention are central building blocks. We argue that a manager may intentionally influence the degree of discretion by purposefully choosing the set of issues and options to be included in his or her strategic issue array. However, though it is the manager him- or herself who ultimately decides upon the allocation of his or her scarce attentional resources, we argue that this decision and, by that, the degree of managerial discretion is substantially affected by personal, relational, and situational factors. Understanding how these factors affect a manager's allocation of attention over time is imperative to understand the dynamics of managerial discretion.
AB - A quarter of a century ago Hambrick and Finkelstein (1987) called for work on the dynamics of managerial discretion. The present paper aims at developing ideas of such a dynamic view by integrating insights from research on cognition and learning into discretion theory, complementing established research on the role of context with a view that focuses on the manager as the driving force of discretion. We conceptualize discretion as the scope of options a manager may choose from. Accordingly, the cognitive concepts of awareness and attention are central building blocks. We argue that a manager may intentionally influence the degree of discretion by purposefully choosing the set of issues and options to be included in his or her strategic issue array. However, though it is the manager him- or herself who ultimately decides upon the allocation of his or her scarce attentional resources, we argue that this decision and, by that, the degree of managerial discretion is substantially affected by personal, relational, and situational factors. Understanding how these factors affect a manager's allocation of attention over time is imperative to understand the dynamics of managerial discretion.
KW - Awareness
KW - Dynamic model
KW - Executive cognition
KW - Managerial attention
KW - Managerial discretion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882672545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.11.009
DO - 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.11.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84882672545
SN - 0956-5221
VL - 29
SP - 264
EP - 281
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Management
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Management
IS - 3
ER -