TY - JOUR
T1 - High degree of consensus achieved regarding diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability among ESA-ESSKA members
AU - ESA DELPHI Consensus Panel
AU - Rosso, Claudio
AU - Martetschläger, Frank
AU - Saccomanno, Maristella F.
AU - Voss, Andreas
AU - Lacheta, Lucca
AU - Ângelo, Ana Catarina
AU - Antonogiannakis, Emmanuel
AU - Azevedo, Clara
AU - Bak, Klaus
AU - Becirbegovic, Semin
AU - Beitzel, Knut
AU - Bilsel, Kerem
AU - Brzoska, Roman
AU - Calvo, Angel
AU - Charousset, Christophe
AU - Dyrna, Felix
AU - Brilakis, Emmanuel
AU - Franceschi, Francesco
AU - Glasson, Jean Marc
AU - Gleyze, Pascal
AU - Gomes, Nuno
AU - Hackney, Roger
AU - Hantes, Michael
AU - Karargyris, Orestis
AU - Karahan, Mustafa
AU - Kovacic, Ladislav
AU - Kubashev, Alexander
AU - Lacheta, Lucca
AU - Lorbach, Olaf
AU - Maben, Benjo
AU - Marjanovic, Benjamin
AU - Martetschlaeger, Frank
AU - Yiannakopolus, Christos
AU - Ostermann, Roman C.
AU - Panagopoulos, Andreas
AU - Papadopoulos, Perikles
AU - Poberaj, Boris
AU - Rosso, Claudio
AU - Saccomanno, Maristella Francesca
AU - Smolen, Daniel
AU - Soler, Francesc
AU - Taverna, Ettore
AU - Toussaint, Bruno
AU - Vavken, Patrick
AU - Voss, Andreas
AU - Zurita, Nestor
AU - Beitzel, Knut
AU - Milano, Giuseppe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Purpose: To develop a consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability. Methods: A consensus process following the modified Delphi technique was conducted. Panel members were selected among the European Shoulder Associates of ESSKA. Five rounds were performed between October 2018 and November 2019. The first round consisted of gathering questions which were then divided into blocks referring to imaging, classifications, surgical approach for acute and chronic cases, conservative treatment. Subsequent rounds consisted of condensation by means of an online questionnaire. Consensus was achieved when ≥ 66.7% of the participants agreed on one answer. Descriptive statistic was used to summarize the data. Results: A consensus was reached on the following topics. Imaging: a true anteroposterior or a bilateral Zanca view are sufficient for diagnosis. 93% of the panel agreed on clinical override testing during body cross test to identify horizontal instability. The Rockwood classification, as modified by the ISAKOS statement, was deemed valid. The separation line between acute and chronic cases was set at 3 weeks. The panel agreed on arthroscopically assisted anatomic reconstruction using a suspensory device (86.2%), with no need of a biological augmentation (82.8%) in acute injuries, whereas biological reconstruction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with tendon graft was suggested in chronic cases. Conservative approach and postoperative care were found similar Conclusion: A consensus was found on the main topics of controversy in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Each step of the diagnostic treatment algorithm was fully investigated and clarified. Level of evidence: Level V.
AB - Purpose: To develop a consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability. Methods: A consensus process following the modified Delphi technique was conducted. Panel members were selected among the European Shoulder Associates of ESSKA. Five rounds were performed between October 2018 and November 2019. The first round consisted of gathering questions which were then divided into blocks referring to imaging, classifications, surgical approach for acute and chronic cases, conservative treatment. Subsequent rounds consisted of condensation by means of an online questionnaire. Consensus was achieved when ≥ 66.7% of the participants agreed on one answer. Descriptive statistic was used to summarize the data. Results: A consensus was reached on the following topics. Imaging: a true anteroposterior or a bilateral Zanca view are sufficient for diagnosis. 93% of the panel agreed on clinical override testing during body cross test to identify horizontal instability. The Rockwood classification, as modified by the ISAKOS statement, was deemed valid. The separation line between acute and chronic cases was set at 3 weeks. The panel agreed on arthroscopically assisted anatomic reconstruction using a suspensory device (86.2%), with no need of a biological augmentation (82.8%) in acute injuries, whereas biological reconstruction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with tendon graft was suggested in chronic cases. Conservative approach and postoperative care were found similar Conclusion: A consensus was found on the main topics of controversy in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Each step of the diagnostic treatment algorithm was fully investigated and clarified. Level of evidence: Level V.
KW - Ac joint
KW - Ac joint instability
KW - Acromioclavicular joint
KW - Consensus
KW - Delphi
KW - Diagnosis
KW - European shoulder associates
KW - Instability
KW - Treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85091427654
U2 - 10.1007/s00167-020-06286-w
DO - 10.1007/s00167-020-06286-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 32980887
AN - SCOPUS:85091427654
SN - 0942-2056
VL - 29
SP - 2325
EP - 2332
JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
IS - 7
ER -