Heat management of a compact x-ray source for microbeam radiotherapy and FLASH treatments

Johanna Winter, Anton Dimroth, Sebastian Roetzer, Yunzhe Zhang, Karl Ludwig Krämer, Christian Petrich, Christoph Matejcek, Kurt Aulenbacher, Markus Zimmermann, Stephanie E. Combs, Marek Galek, Ghaleb Natour, Michael Butzek, Jan J. Wilkens, Stefan Bartzsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Microbeam and x-ray FLASH radiation therapy are innovative concepts that promise reduced normal tissue toxicity in radiation oncology without compromising tumor control. However, currently only large third-generation synchrotrons deliver acceptable x-ray beam qualities and there is a need for compact, hospital-based radiation sources to facilitate clinical translation of these novel treatment strategies. Purpose: We are currently setting up the first prototype of a line-focus x-ray tube (LFxT), a promising technology that may deliver ultra-high dose rates (UHDRs) of more than 100 Gy/s from a table-top source. The operation of the source in the heat capacity limit allows very high dose rates with micrometer-sized focal spot widths. Here, we investigate concepts of effective heat management for the LFxT, a prerequisite for the performance of the source. Methods: For different focal spot widths, we investigated the temperature increase numerically with Monte Carlo simulations and finite element analysis (FEA). We benchmarked the temperature and thermal stresses at the focal spot against a commercial x-ray tube with similar power characteristics. We assessed thermal loads at the vacuum chamber housing caused by scattering electrons in Monte Carlo simulations and FEA. Further, we discuss active cooling strategies and present a design of the rotating target. Results: Conventional focal spot widths led to a temperature increase dominated by heat conduction, while very narrow focal spots led to a temperature increase dominated by the heat capacity of the target material. Due to operation in the heat capacity limit, the temperature increase at the focal spot was lower than for the investigated commercial x-ray tube. Hence, the thermal stress at the focal spot of the LFxT was considered uncritical. The target shaft and the vacuum chamber housing require active cooling to withstand the high heat loads. Conclusions: The heat capacity limit allows very high power densities at the focal spot of the LFxT and thus facilitates very high dose rates. Numerical simulations demonstrated that the heat load imparted by scattering electrons requires active cooling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3375-3388
Number of pages14
JournalMedical Physics
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022

Keywords

  • FLASH radiation therapy
  • compact x-ray source
  • heat management
  • line-focus x-ray tube
  • microbeam radiation therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heat management of a compact x-ray source for microbeam radiotherapy and FLASH treatments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this