Hearing-Preserving Approaches to the Internal Auditory Canal: Feasibility Assessment from the Perspective of an Endoscope

Objective: Minimally invasive transcanal transpromontorial endoscopic approaches to the internal auditory canal sacrifice the cochlea. Two hearing-preserving approaches, the exclusively endoscopic transcanal infracochlear approach and the endoscope-assisted transmastoid retrolabyrinthine approach, have been controversially discussed in the literature. In this study, we examine the feasibility of these 2 approaches by means of three-dimensional surface models, a population-based analysis of the available surgical space, and dissections in human whole-head specimens. Methods: We reconstructed three-dimensional surface models based on clinical high-resolution computed tomography scans of 53 adult temporal bones. For both approaches, we measured the maximal extensions and the area of the surgical access windows located between landmarks on the surrounding anatomic structures. We then identified the limiting extensions and derived the cumulative distribution to describe the available surgical space. Dissections were performed to validate the corridors and landmark selection. Results: The limiting extension for the infrachochlear approach is 7.0 ± 2.7 mm from the round window to the dome of the jugular bulb. The limiting extension for the retrolabyrinthine approach is 6.4 ± 1.5 mm from the dura of the posterior fossa to the facial nerve. The cumulative distribution shows that 80% of the cohort have access window extensions ≥3 mm for both approaches. Conclusions: This study shows that in a high percentage of the measured cohort, the access windows are sufficiently large for endoscopic approaches to the internal auditory canal. With appropriate instrumentation, these hearing-preserving minimally invasive approaches may evolve into alternatives to surgical treatment.