TY - JOUR
T1 - Head-to-head comparison of 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of various tumors
AU - Watanabe, Masao
AU - Fendler, Wolfgang P.
AU - Grafe, Hong
AU - Hirmas, Nader
AU - Hamacher, Rainer
AU - Lanzafame, Helena
AU - Pabst, Kim M.
AU - Hautzel, Hubertus
AU - Aigner, Clemens
AU - Kasper, Stefan
AU - von Tresckow, Bastian
AU - Stuschke, Martin
AU - Kümmel, Sherko
AU - Lugnier, Celine
AU - Hadaschik, Boris
AU - Grünwald, Viktor
AU - Zarrad, Fadi
AU - Kersting, David
AU - Siveke, Jens T.
AU - Herrmann, Ken
AU - Weber, Manuel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2024.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Objective: FAPI-PET/CT exhibits high tumor uptake and low background accumulation, enabling high-sensitivity tumor detection. We compared the diagnostic performance of 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and standalone CE-CT in patients with various malignancies. Methods: 232 patients underwent 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT,18F-FDG PET/CT, and CE-CT each within 4 weeks. Detection rates were assessed by a blinded reader, with ≥ 2 weeks between scans of the same patient to avoid recall bias. A sub-analysis of diagnostic performance was performed for 490 histopathologically validated lesions. Detection rates were compared using McNemar’s test. Results: Lesion-based detection rates in 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and CE-CT alone were 91.2% (1540/1688), 82.5% (1393/1688) and 60.2% (1016/1688). The detection rates were significantly higher for 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT than for 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT (p < 0.02 for primary lesions and p < 0.001 for total, abdominopelvic nodal, liver and other visceral lesions) and CE-CT (p < 0.0001 for total, primary, cervicothoracic nodal, abdominopelvic nodal, liver, other visceral, and bone lesions). In the sub-analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy were 61.3%, 96.7%, 81.4%, 91.4% and 90.0% for 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT, 57.0%, 95.7%, 75.7%, 90.5% and 88.4% for 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and 51.6%, 97.2%, 81.4%, 89.6% and 88.6% for CECT, respectively. Conclusions: 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT demonstrates a higher tumor detection rate than 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT and CE-CT in a diverse spectrum of malignancies, especially for primary, abdominopelvic nodal, liver, and other visceral lesions. Further studies on which entities draw particular benefit from 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT are warranted to aid appropriate diagnostic workup. Trial registration: A total of N = 232 patients were analyzed. Of these, N = 50 patients were included in a prospective interventional trial (NCT05160051), and N = 175 in a prospective observational trial (NCT04571086) for correlation and clinical follow-up of PET findings; N = 7 patients were analyzed retrospectively.
AB - Objective: FAPI-PET/CT exhibits high tumor uptake and low background accumulation, enabling high-sensitivity tumor detection. We compared the diagnostic performance of 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and standalone CE-CT in patients with various malignancies. Methods: 232 patients underwent 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT,18F-FDG PET/CT, and CE-CT each within 4 weeks. Detection rates were assessed by a blinded reader, with ≥ 2 weeks between scans of the same patient to avoid recall bias. A sub-analysis of diagnostic performance was performed for 490 histopathologically validated lesions. Detection rates were compared using McNemar’s test. Results: Lesion-based detection rates in 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and CE-CT alone were 91.2% (1540/1688), 82.5% (1393/1688) and 60.2% (1016/1688). The detection rates were significantly higher for 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT than for 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT (p < 0.02 for primary lesions and p < 0.001 for total, abdominopelvic nodal, liver and other visceral lesions) and CE-CT (p < 0.0001 for total, primary, cervicothoracic nodal, abdominopelvic nodal, liver, other visceral, and bone lesions). In the sub-analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy were 61.3%, 96.7%, 81.4%, 91.4% and 90.0% for 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT, 57.0%, 95.7%, 75.7%, 90.5% and 88.4% for 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT, and 51.6%, 97.2%, 81.4%, 89.6% and 88.6% for CECT, respectively. Conclusions: 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT plus CE-CT demonstrates a higher tumor detection rate than 18F-FDG PET/CT plus CE-CT and CE-CT in a diverse spectrum of malignancies, especially for primary, abdominopelvic nodal, liver, and other visceral lesions. Further studies on which entities draw particular benefit from 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT are warranted to aid appropriate diagnostic workup. Trial registration: A total of N = 232 patients were analyzed. Of these, N = 50 patients were included in a prospective interventional trial (NCT05160051), and N = 175 in a prospective observational trial (NCT04571086) for correlation and clinical follow-up of PET findings; N = 7 patients were analyzed retrospectively.
KW - Contrast-enhanced CT
KW - Detection rate
KW - F-FDG
KW - PET/CT
KW - Ga-FAPI-46
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206989840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12149-024-01993-7
DO - 10.1007/s12149-024-01993-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85206989840
SN - 0914-7187
VL - 39
SP - 255
EP - 265
JO - Annals of Nuclear Medicine
JF - Annals of Nuclear Medicine
IS - 3
ER -