TY - JOUR
T1 - H 1-antihistamine up-dosing in chronic spontaneous urticaria
T2 - Patients' perspective of effectiveness and side effects - a retrospective survey study
AU - Weller, Karsten
AU - Ziege, Claudia
AU - Staubach, Petra
AU - Brockow, Knut
AU - Siebenhaar, Frank
AU - Krause, Karoline
AU - Altrichter, Sabine
AU - Church, Martin K.
AU - Maurer, Marcus
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts. This work was supported by Essex Pharma (now MSD). KW: The author declares that he is or recently was involved in clinical trials supported by Essex Pharma (now MSD) and was compensated for educational lectures by Essex Pharma (now MSD), Novartis, Shire and UCB. PS: The author declares that he is or recently was involved in clinical trials supported by Essex Pharma (now MSD) and was compensated for educational lectures by Essex Pharma (now MSD), Novartis and Shire. FS: The author declares that he was previously involved in clinical trials supported by Essex Pharma (now MSD) and was compensated for educational lectures. KK: The author declares that she was compensated for educational lectures by Novartis, Dr. Pfleger, Shire and received a travel grant from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. MKC: The author declares that he has received honoraria for lectures or consulting from UCB Pharma, Glaxo Smith Kline, Aventis, FAES Pharma and Schering Plough. MM: The author declares that he is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for Almirall Hermal, Bayer Schering Pharma, Biofrontera, Essex Pharma, Genentech, JADO Technologies, Jerini, Merckle Recordati, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Schering-Plough, Leo, MSD, Merck, Shire, Symbiopharm, UCB, and Uriach. None of the authors has patents or commercial interests in products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter their adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.
PY - 2011/9/1
Y1 - 2011/9/1
N2 - Background: The guidelines recommend that first line treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria should be second generation non-sedating H 1-antihistamines with a positive recommendation against the use of old sedating first generation antihistamines. If standard dosing is not effective, increasing the dosage up to four-fold is recommended. The objective of this study was to obtain the chronic spontaneous urticaria-patient perspective on the effectiveness and unwanted effects of H 1-antihistamines in standard and higher doses. Methodology/Principal Findings: This was a questionnaire based survey, initially completed by 368 individuals. 319 (248 female, 71 male, median age 42 years) had a physician-confirmed diagnosis of chronic spontaneous urticaria and were included in the results. Participants believed standard doses (manufacturers recommended dose) of second generation antihistamines to be significantly (P<0.005) more effective than first generation drugs. Furthermore, they believed that second generation drugs caused significantly (P<0.001) fewer unwanted effects and caused significantly (P<0.001) less sedation than first generation antihistamines. Three-quarters of the patients stated that they had up-dosed with antihistamines with 40%, 42% and 54% reporting significant added benefit from taking 2, 3 or 4 tablets daily respectively. The number of reports of unwanted effects and sedation following up-dosing were not significantly different from those reported for standard doses. Conclusions: This survey supports the urticaria guidelines recommendations that the first line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria should be second generation rather than first generation H 1-antihistamines and that, if standard dosing is not effective, the dosage should be increased up to four-fold.
AB - Background: The guidelines recommend that first line treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria should be second generation non-sedating H 1-antihistamines with a positive recommendation against the use of old sedating first generation antihistamines. If standard dosing is not effective, increasing the dosage up to four-fold is recommended. The objective of this study was to obtain the chronic spontaneous urticaria-patient perspective on the effectiveness and unwanted effects of H 1-antihistamines in standard and higher doses. Methodology/Principal Findings: This was a questionnaire based survey, initially completed by 368 individuals. 319 (248 female, 71 male, median age 42 years) had a physician-confirmed diagnosis of chronic spontaneous urticaria and were included in the results. Participants believed standard doses (manufacturers recommended dose) of second generation antihistamines to be significantly (P<0.005) more effective than first generation drugs. Furthermore, they believed that second generation drugs caused significantly (P<0.001) fewer unwanted effects and caused significantly (P<0.001) less sedation than first generation antihistamines. Three-quarters of the patients stated that they had up-dosed with antihistamines with 40%, 42% and 54% reporting significant added benefit from taking 2, 3 or 4 tablets daily respectively. The number of reports of unwanted effects and sedation following up-dosing were not significantly different from those reported for standard doses. Conclusions: This survey supports the urticaria guidelines recommendations that the first line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria should be second generation rather than first generation H 1-antihistamines and that, if standard dosing is not effective, the dosage should be increased up to four-fold.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052349904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0023931
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0023931
M3 - Article
C2 - 21909407
AN - SCOPUS:80052349904
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 6
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 9
M1 - e23931
ER -