TY - JOUR
T1 - GW100
T2 - Benchmarking G0W0 for Molecular Systems
AU - Van Setten, Michiel J.
AU - Caruso, Fabio
AU - Sharifzadeh, Sahar
AU - Ren, Xinguo
AU - Scheffler, Matthias
AU - Liu, Fang
AU - Lischner, Johannes
AU - Lin, Lin
AU - Deslippe, Jack R.
AU - Louie, Steven G.
AU - Yang, Chao
AU - Weigend, Florian
AU - Neaton, Jeffrey B.
AU - Evers, Ferdinand
AU - Rinke, Patrick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2015/10/22
Y1 - 2015/10/22
N2 - We present the GW100 set. GW100 is a benchmark set of the ionization potentials and electron affinities of 100 molecules computed with the GW method using three independent GW codes and different GW methodologies. The quasi-particle energies of the highest-occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) and lowest-unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO) are calculated for the GW100 set at the G0W0@PBE level using the software packages TURBOMOLE, FHI-aims, and BerkeleyGW. The use of these three codes allows for a quantitative comparison of the type of basis set (plane wave or local orbital) and handling of unoccupied states, the treatment of core and valence electrons (all electron or pseudopotentials), the treatment of the frequency dependence of the self-energy (full frequency or more approximate plasmon-pole models), and the algorithm for solving the quasi-particle equation. Primary results include reference values for future benchmarks, best practices for convergence within a particular approach, and average error bars for the most common approximations.
AB - We present the GW100 set. GW100 is a benchmark set of the ionization potentials and electron affinities of 100 molecules computed with the GW method using three independent GW codes and different GW methodologies. The quasi-particle energies of the highest-occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) and lowest-unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO) are calculated for the GW100 set at the G0W0@PBE level using the software packages TURBOMOLE, FHI-aims, and BerkeleyGW. The use of these three codes allows for a quantitative comparison of the type of basis set (plane wave or local orbital) and handling of unoccupied states, the treatment of core and valence electrons (all electron or pseudopotentials), the treatment of the frequency dependence of the self-energy (full frequency or more approximate plasmon-pole models), and the algorithm for solving the quasi-particle equation. Primary results include reference values for future benchmarks, best practices for convergence within a particular approach, and average error bars for the most common approximations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949685892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00453
DO - 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00453
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84949685892
SN - 1549-9618
VL - 11
SP - 5665
EP - 5687
JO - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
JF - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
IS - 12
ER -