TY - JOUR
T1 - Governance typology of universities' technology transfer processes
AU - Schoen, Anja
AU - van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno
AU - Henkel, Joachim
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the European Science Foundation (ESF-APE-INV) for support for this project. The authors are also grateful for comments received from the participants at the 2011 EPIP Conference in Brussels and the 2TS Conference in Augsburg. Moreover, we like to thank Florence Honoré and all interviewees for their support. Anja gratefully acknowledges the support of the TUM Graduate School at the Technische Universität München.
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - Despite the growing interest in university-to-industry technology transfer, there are very few studies on the governance of universities' technology transfer offices (TTOs). The few existing ones tend to focus on US universities and generally tackle one dimension of the governance. The present paper aims at contributing to this literature in two ways. First, it takes into account the diversity of organizational models with a theoretical perspective: the paper presents a discussion on which combinations of four structural dimensions should yield viable configurations. Four main types of TTOs are identified: (1) classical TTO; (2) autonomous TTO; (3) discipline-integrated Technology Transfer Alliance; and (4) discipline-specialized Technology Transfer Alliance. Second, the paper relies on 16 case studies of universities located in six European countries in order to address the pros and cons of the four types of TTOs. The results provide both a conceptual understanding and an empirical overview of how universities organize their technology transfer and intellectual property management.
AB - Despite the growing interest in university-to-industry technology transfer, there are very few studies on the governance of universities' technology transfer offices (TTOs). The few existing ones tend to focus on US universities and generally tackle one dimension of the governance. The present paper aims at contributing to this literature in two ways. First, it takes into account the diversity of organizational models with a theoretical perspective: the paper presents a discussion on which combinations of four structural dimensions should yield viable configurations. Four main types of TTOs are identified: (1) classical TTO; (2) autonomous TTO; (3) discipline-integrated Technology Transfer Alliance; and (4) discipline-specialized Technology Transfer Alliance. Second, the paper relies on 16 case studies of universities located in six European countries in order to address the pros and cons of the four types of TTOs. The results provide both a conceptual understanding and an empirical overview of how universities organize their technology transfer and intellectual property management.
KW - Academic patents
KW - Governance
KW - Organizational structure
KW - Technology transfer offices
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84900327019
U2 - 10.1007/s10961-012-9289-0
DO - 10.1007/s10961-012-9289-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84900327019
SN - 0892-9912
VL - 39
SP - 435
EP - 453
JO - Journal of Technology Transfer
JF - Journal of Technology Transfer
IS - 3
ER -