Good + Bad = ? Developmental Differences in Balancing Gains and Losses in Value-Based Decisions From Memory

Sebastian S. Horn, Rui Mata, Thorsten Pachur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Value-based decisions often involve comparisons between benefits and costs that must be retrieved from memory. To investigate the development of value-based decisions, 9- to 10-year olds (N = 30), 11- to 12-year olds (N = 30), and young adults (N = 30) first learned to associate gain and loss magnitudes with symbols. In a subsequent decision task, participants rapidly evaluated objects that consisted of combinations of these symbols. All age groups achieved high decision performance and were sensitive to gain–loss magnitudes, suggesting that required core cognitive abilities are developed early. A cognitive-modeling analysis of performance revealed that children were less efficient in object evaluation (drift rate) and had longer nondecision times than adults. Developmental differences, which emerged particularly for objects of high positive net value, were linked to mnemonic and numerical abilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-438
Number of pages22
JournalChild Development
Volume91
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Good + Bad = ? Developmental Differences in Balancing Gains and Losses in Value-Based Decisions From Memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this