TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional outcomes after retrosigmoid approach to the cerebellopontine angle
T2 - Observations from a single-center experience of over 13 years
AU - Aftahy, Amir Kaywan
AU - Goldberg, Maria
AU - Butenschoen, Vicki M.
AU - Wagner, Arthur
AU - Meyer, Bernhard
AU - Negwer, Chiara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Introduction: Accessing the posterior base of the skull is complex because of the vital neurovascular structures in the area. However, the retrosigmoid approach (RSA) offers a solution to this challenge. Research question: To analyze surgical outcome of RSA. Material and methods: This study involved a retrospective review of patient charts from a single center, focusing on the surgical procedure and outcomes following the operation. Results: The study included 517 patients suffering from conditions like vestibular schwannomas (VS), metastatic cancers, and trigeminal neuralgia. The most frequent symptoms reported were balance disorders (42.7%), hearing loss (36.5%), walking difficulties (21.2%), headaches (18.9%), facial pain (17.1%), issues with trigeminal nerve function (14.1%), cerebellar dysfunction (13.5%), and facial nerve paralysis (10.2%). The rate of complications stood at 21.1%, with 11.3% of patients needing revision surgery. The median score on the Clavien-Dindo scale was 2, and the rate of mortality related to surgery was 1.0%. Permanent symptom improvement was seen in 72.1% of cases. Temporary new deficits occurred in 43.2% of patients, with facial nerve paralysis being the most common (14.1%). No significant correlation was found between the size of the craniotomy and the extent of tumor resection (p = 0.155), except in the case of VS (p = 0.041). Larger craniotomy sizes were associated with higher rates of complications (p = 0.016), especially CSF leaks (p = 0.006). Complications significantly affected the likelihood and number of new deficits (p < 0.001 for both), particularly postoperative bleeding (p = 0.019, p = 0.001), CSF leaks (p = 0.026, p = 0.039), and hydrocephalus (p = 0.050, p = 0.007). Conclusions: The potential for complications related to the surgical approach cannot be overlooked. The size of the tumor should not dictate larger surgical approaches due to the associated increase in postoperative complications; a tailored approach that considers the precise tumor location and pathology is crucial for optimizing postoperative outcomes.
AB - Introduction: Accessing the posterior base of the skull is complex because of the vital neurovascular structures in the area. However, the retrosigmoid approach (RSA) offers a solution to this challenge. Research question: To analyze surgical outcome of RSA. Material and methods: This study involved a retrospective review of patient charts from a single center, focusing on the surgical procedure and outcomes following the operation. Results: The study included 517 patients suffering from conditions like vestibular schwannomas (VS), metastatic cancers, and trigeminal neuralgia. The most frequent symptoms reported were balance disorders (42.7%), hearing loss (36.5%), walking difficulties (21.2%), headaches (18.9%), facial pain (17.1%), issues with trigeminal nerve function (14.1%), cerebellar dysfunction (13.5%), and facial nerve paralysis (10.2%). The rate of complications stood at 21.1%, with 11.3% of patients needing revision surgery. The median score on the Clavien-Dindo scale was 2, and the rate of mortality related to surgery was 1.0%. Permanent symptom improvement was seen in 72.1% of cases. Temporary new deficits occurred in 43.2% of patients, with facial nerve paralysis being the most common (14.1%). No significant correlation was found between the size of the craniotomy and the extent of tumor resection (p = 0.155), except in the case of VS (p = 0.041). Larger craniotomy sizes were associated with higher rates of complications (p = 0.016), especially CSF leaks (p = 0.006). Complications significantly affected the likelihood and number of new deficits (p < 0.001 for both), particularly postoperative bleeding (p = 0.019, p = 0.001), CSF leaks (p = 0.026, p = 0.039), and hydrocephalus (p = 0.050, p = 0.007). Conclusions: The potential for complications related to the surgical approach cannot be overlooked. The size of the tumor should not dictate larger surgical approaches due to the associated increase in postoperative complications; a tailored approach that considers the precise tumor location and pathology is crucial for optimizing postoperative outcomes.
KW - Cerebellopontine angle
KW - Neurosurgery
KW - Operative technique
KW - Retrosigmoid approach
KW - Skull base surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200631160&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102909
DO - 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102909
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85200631160
SN - 2772-5294
VL - 4
JO - Brain and Spine
JF - Brain and Spine
M1 - 102909
ER -