Frontotemporale Demenz (FTD) - Trotz neuer Konsensuskriterien immer noch eine differenzialdiagnostische Herausforderung

S. Lüscher; D. Schwerthöffer; J. Diehl-Schmid

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1365978

Frontotemporale Demenz (FTD) - Trotz neuer Konsensuskriterien immer noch eine differenzialdiagnostische Herausforderung

Translated title of the contribution: Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) - Even with revisited criteria a diagnostic challenge

S. Lüscher, D. Schwerthöffer, J. Diehl-Schmid

Technical University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia remains a diagnostic challenge. Especially the differential diagnosis between FTD and affective disorders is often difficult. Based on a case report, diagnostic efforts and differential diagnoses are described and revisited criteria for the behavioral FTD (bvFTD) from Rascowsky et al. are mentioned.

Translated title of the contribution	Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) - Even with revisited criteria a diagnostic challenge
Original language	German
Pages (from-to)	267-270
Number of pages	4
Journal	Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie
Volume	82
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1365978
State	Published - May 2014
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1055/s-0034-1365978

Cite this

@article{a2f7cd46f8a441f588edfe52a3b91bf5,

title = "Frontotemporale Demenz (FTD) - Trotz neuer Konsensuskriterien immer noch eine differenzialdiagnostische Herausforderung",

abstract = "Frontotemporal dementia remains a diagnostic challenge. Especially the differential diagnosis between FTD and affective disorders is often difficult. Based on a case report, diagnostic efforts and differential diagnoses are described and revisited criteria for the behavioral FTD (bvFTD) from Rascowsky et al. are mentioned.",

keywords = "affective disorder, frontotemporal dementia, FTD, revisited diagnostic criteria",

author = "S. L{\"u}scher and D. Schwerth{\"o}ffer and J. Diehl-Schmid",

year = "2014",

month = may,

doi = "10.1055/s-0034-1365978",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "82",

pages = "267--270",

journal = "Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie",

issn = "0720-4299",

publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frontotemporale Demenz (FTD) - Trotz neuer Konsensuskriterien immer noch eine differenzialdiagnostische Herausforderung

AU - Lüscher, S.

AU - Schwerthöffer, D.

AU - Diehl-Schmid, J.

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Frontotemporal dementia remains a diagnostic challenge. Especially the differential diagnosis between FTD and affective disorders is often difficult. Based on a case report, diagnostic efforts and differential diagnoses are described and revisited criteria for the behavioral FTD (bvFTD) from Rascowsky et al. are mentioned.

AB - Frontotemporal dementia remains a diagnostic challenge. Especially the differential diagnosis between FTD and affective disorders is often difficult. Based on a case report, diagnostic efforts and differential diagnoses are described and revisited criteria for the behavioral FTD (bvFTD) from Rascowsky et al. are mentioned.

KW - affective disorder

KW - frontotemporal dementia

KW - FTD

KW - revisited diagnostic criteria

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901063959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0034-1365978

DO - 10.1055/s-0034-1365978

M3 - Artikel

C2 - 24824204

AN - SCOPUS:84901063959

SN - 0720-4299

VL - 82

SP - 267

EP - 270

JO - Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie

JF - Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie

IS - 5

ER -

Frontotemporale Demenz (FTD) - Trotz neuer Konsensuskriterien immer noch eine differenzialdiagnostische Herausforderung

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this