TY - JOUR
T1 - Frequent Nutritional Feedback, Personalized Advice, and Behavioral Changes
T2 - Findings from the European Food4Me Internet-Based RCT
AU - Food4Me Study
AU - Celis-Morales, Carlos
AU - Livingstone, Katherine M.
AU - Petermann-Rocha, F.
AU - Navas-Carretero, Santiago
AU - San-Cristobal, Rodrigo
AU - O'Donovan, Clare B.
AU - Moschonis, George
AU - Manios, Yannis
AU - Traczyk, I.
AU - Drevon, Christian A.
AU - Daniel, Hannelore
AU - Marsaux, Cyril F.M.
AU - Saris, Wim H.M.
AU - Fallaize, Rosalind
AU - Macready, Anna L.
AU - Lovegrove, Julie A.
AU - Gibney, Mike
AU - Gibney, Eileen R.
AU - Walsh, Marianne
AU - Brennan, Lorraine
AU - Martinez, J. Alfredo
AU - Mathers, John C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Introduction: This study tested the hypothesis that providing personalized nutritional advice and feedback more frequently would promote larger, more appropriate, and sustained changes in dietary behavior as well as greater reduction in adiposity. Study design: A 6-month RCT (Food4Me) was conducted in seven European countries between 2012 and 2013. Setting/participants: A total of 1,125 participants were randomized to Lower- (n=562) or Higher- (n=563) Frequency Feedback groups. Intervention: Participants in the Lower-Frequency group received personalized nutritional advice at baseline and at Months 3 and 6 of the intervention, whereas the Higher-Frequency group received personalized nutritional advice at baseline and at Months 1, 2, 3 and 6. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were change in dietary intake (at food and nutrient levels) and obesity-related traits (body weight, BMI, and waist circumference). Participants completed an online Food Frequency Questionnaire to estimate usual dietary intake at baseline and at Months 3 and 6 of the intervention. Overall diet quality was evaluated using the 2010 Healthy Eating Index. Obesity-related traits were self-measured and reported by participants via the Internet. Statistical analyses were performed during the first quarter of 2018. Results: At 3 months, participants in the Lower- and Higher-Frequency Feedback groups showed improvements in Healthy Eating Index score; this improvement was larger in the Higher-Frequency group than the Lower-Frequency group (Δ=1.84 points, 95% CI=0.79, 2.89, p=0.0001). Similarly, there were greater improvements for the Higher- versus Lower-Frequency group for body weight (Δ= −0.73 kg, 95% CI= −1.07, −0.38, p<0.0001), BMI (Δ= −0.24 kg/m2, 95% CI= −0.36, −0.13, p<0.0001), and waist circumference (Δ= −1.20 cm, 95% CI= −2.36, −0.04, p=0.039). However, only body weight and BMI remained significant at 6 months. Conclusions: At 3 months, higher-frequency feedback produced larger improvements in overall diet quality as well as in body weight and waist circumference than lower-frequency feedback. However, only body weight and BMI remained significant at 6 months. Trial registration: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01530139.
AB - Introduction: This study tested the hypothesis that providing personalized nutritional advice and feedback more frequently would promote larger, more appropriate, and sustained changes in dietary behavior as well as greater reduction in adiposity. Study design: A 6-month RCT (Food4Me) was conducted in seven European countries between 2012 and 2013. Setting/participants: A total of 1,125 participants were randomized to Lower- (n=562) or Higher- (n=563) Frequency Feedback groups. Intervention: Participants in the Lower-Frequency group received personalized nutritional advice at baseline and at Months 3 and 6 of the intervention, whereas the Higher-Frequency group received personalized nutritional advice at baseline and at Months 1, 2, 3 and 6. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were change in dietary intake (at food and nutrient levels) and obesity-related traits (body weight, BMI, and waist circumference). Participants completed an online Food Frequency Questionnaire to estimate usual dietary intake at baseline and at Months 3 and 6 of the intervention. Overall diet quality was evaluated using the 2010 Healthy Eating Index. Obesity-related traits were self-measured and reported by participants via the Internet. Statistical analyses were performed during the first quarter of 2018. Results: At 3 months, participants in the Lower- and Higher-Frequency Feedback groups showed improvements in Healthy Eating Index score; this improvement was larger in the Higher-Frequency group than the Lower-Frequency group (Δ=1.84 points, 95% CI=0.79, 2.89, p=0.0001). Similarly, there were greater improvements for the Higher- versus Lower-Frequency group for body weight (Δ= −0.73 kg, 95% CI= −1.07, −0.38, p<0.0001), BMI (Δ= −0.24 kg/m2, 95% CI= −0.36, −0.13, p<0.0001), and waist circumference (Δ= −1.20 cm, 95% CI= −2.36, −0.04, p=0.039). However, only body weight and BMI remained significant at 6 months. Conclusions: At 3 months, higher-frequency feedback produced larger improvements in overall diet quality as well as in body weight and waist circumference than lower-frequency feedback. However, only body weight and BMI remained significant at 6 months. Trial registration: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01530139.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067672303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.024
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 31248745
AN - SCOPUS:85067672303
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 57
SP - 209
EP - 219
JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
IS - 2
ER -