TY - JOUR
T1 - Forecasting seasonally fluctuating sales of perishable products in the horticultural industry
AU - Eiglsperger, Josef
AU - Haselbeck, Florian
AU - Stiele, Viola
AU - Serrano, Claudia Guadarrama
AU - Lim-Trinh, Kelly
AU - Menrad, Klaus
AU - Hannus, Thomas
AU - Grimm, Dominik G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - Accurately forecasting demand is a potential competitive advantage, especially when dealing with perishable products. The multi-billion dollar horticultural industry is highly affected by perishability, but has received limited attention in forecasting research. In this paper, we analyze the applicability of general compared to dataset-specific predictors, as well as the influence of external information and online model update schemes. We employ a heterogeneous set of horticultural data, three classical, and twelve machine learning-based forecasting approaches. Our results show a superiority of multivariate machine learning methods, in particular the ensemble learner XGBoost. These advantages highlight the importance of external factors, with the feature set containing statistical, calendrical, and weather-related features leading to the most robust performance. We further observe that a general model is unable to capture the heterogeneity of the data and is outperformed by dataset-specific predictors. Moreover, frequent model updates have a negligible impact on forecasting quality, allowing long-term forecasting without significant performance degradation.
AB - Accurately forecasting demand is a potential competitive advantage, especially when dealing with perishable products. The multi-billion dollar horticultural industry is highly affected by perishability, but has received limited attention in forecasting research. In this paper, we analyze the applicability of general compared to dataset-specific predictors, as well as the influence of external information and online model update schemes. We employ a heterogeneous set of horticultural data, three classical, and twelve machine learning-based forecasting approaches. Our results show a superiority of multivariate machine learning methods, in particular the ensemble learner XGBoost. These advantages highlight the importance of external factors, with the feature set containing statistical, calendrical, and weather-related features leading to the most robust performance. We further observe that a general model is unable to capture the heterogeneity of the data and is outperformed by dataset-specific predictors. Moreover, frequent model updates have a negligible impact on forecasting quality, allowing long-term forecasting without significant performance degradation.
KW - Comparative studies
KW - Demand forecasting
KW - Machine learning
KW - Multivariate time series
KW - Regression
KW - Sales forecasting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185728600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123438
DO - 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123438
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85185728600
SN - 0957-4174
VL - 249
JO - Expert Systems with Applications
JF - Expert Systems with Applications
M1 - 123438
ER -