Abstract
Objective: After radical retropubic prostatectomy a rise of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) indicates a local recurrent or metastatic disease. If the bone scan shows no apparent bone metastasis, morphological imaging methods like x-ray computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or transrectal ultrasound often cannot distinguish between postoperative scar and local recurrence. Therefore we investigated the feasibility of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18 FDG PET) for metabolic characterization of prostatic cancer, especially for differentiation of scar or recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Methods: Dynamic PET with 370 MBq F-18 deoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) up to 60 min p.i. was performed in 2 patients with biopsy-proven benign prostatic hyperplasia, in 11 patients with a histologically proven prostate cancer prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and 7 patients with suspected local recurrence (with negative bone scan) after RRP prior to biopsy of anastomosis (3 local recurrence, 4 postoperative scar). Results: Prostate cancer showed a very low F-18 FDG uptake. The placement of regions of interest was only possible by the use of other imaging methods. There was not difference between the F-18 FDG uptake of benign prostate hyperplasia, prostate carcinoma, postoperative scar or local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Conclusion: F-18 FDG seems not to be useful to distinguish between postoperative scar and local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 31-35 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | European Urology |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1999 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose
- Positron emission tomography
- Prostate cancer
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useless for the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver