Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Final 3-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Comparing a Self-Expanding to a Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve

  • Jonas Lanz
  • , Helge Möllmann
  • , Won Keun Kim
  • , Christof Burgdorf
  • , Axel Linke
  • , Simon Redwood
  • , Michael Hilker
  • , Michael Joner
  • , Holger Thiele
  • , Lars Conzelmann
  • , Lenard Conradi
  • , Sebastian Kerber
  • , Christian Thilo
  • , Stefan Toggweiler
  • , Bernard Prendergast
  • , Oliver Husser
  • , Stefan Stortecky
  • , Sarah Deckarm
  • , Arnaud Künzi
  • , Dik Heg
  • Thomas Walther, Stephan Windecker, Thomas Pilgrim
  • Inselspital Universitatsspital
  • St. Johannes Hospital
  • Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center
  • Heart and Vascular Centre
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • St Thomas' Hospital
  • Klinikum der Universität Regensburg und Medizinische Fakultät
  • University of Leipzig
  • Helios Klinik
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Cardiovascular Centre Bad Neustadt
  • Klinikum Rosenheim
  • Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne
  • Augustinum Klinik Munich
  • Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the SCOPE I trial (Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis), transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding ACURATE neo (NEO) did not meet noninferiority compared with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (S3) device regarding a composite end point at 30 days due to higher rates of prosthetic valve regurgitation and acute kidney injury. Data on long-term durability of NEO are scarce. Here, we report whether early differences between NEO and S3 translate into differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure 3 years after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomized to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with NEO or S3 at 20 European centers. Clinical outcomes at 3 years are compared using Cox proportional or Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models by intention-to-treat. Bioprosthetic valve failure is reported for the valve-implant cohort. RESULTS: Among 739 patients, 84 of 372 patients (24.3%) had died in the NEO and 85 of 367 (25%) in the S3 group at 3 years. Comparing NEO with S3, the 3-year rates of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.73-1.33]), stroke (subhazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.56-1.92]), and hospitalization for congestive heart failure (subhazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.51-1.07]) were similar between the groups. Aortic valve reinterventions were required in 4 NEO and 3 S3 patients (subhazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.30-5.85]). New York Heart Association functional class ≤II was observed in 84% (NEO) and 85% (S3), respectively. Mean gradients remained lower after NEO at 3 years (8 versus 12 mm Hg; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early differences between NEO and S3 did not translate into significant differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure throughout 3 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03011346.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E012873
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • TAVI
  • TAVR
  • bioprosthesis
  • randomized trial
  • transcatheter heart valves

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Final 3-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Comparing a Self-Expanding to a Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this