TY - GEN
T1 - FE based measures for structure borne sound radiation
AU - Klaerner, Matthias
AU - Marburg, Steffen
AU - Kroll, Lothar
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The sound emission of thin-walled radiating components is a common objective of structural optimisation. Acoustic measures are not implemented in common FE-codes. Thus, different velocitiy based measures will be compared: the kinetic energy, the equivalent radiated power (ERP) and the lumped parameter model (LPM). The most common approach - The ERP - is based on the sound intensity in normal direction and the sound pressure on the radiating surface. Assuming a unit radiation efficiency all-over the surface and neglecting local effects, this is a common approach for an upper bound of structure borne noise. Therein, the sound power finally results from the squared velocity integrated over the radiating surface and the constant fluid impedance. As ERP usually requires extra post processing to consider the velocity in normal surface direction, the kinetic energy is essential in common FEA results including all velocity components apart from the normal direction, too. Thus, it is less accurate but maybe usable for optimisation abilities. In contrast, LPM is a simplification of the Rayleigh-integral and thus gives quite accurate results but requires significant higher computational costs than ERP. Possibilities and limits of estimating the emitted sound power by these three methods will be shown.
AB - The sound emission of thin-walled radiating components is a common objective of structural optimisation. Acoustic measures are not implemented in common FE-codes. Thus, different velocitiy based measures will be compared: the kinetic energy, the equivalent radiated power (ERP) and the lumped parameter model (LPM). The most common approach - The ERP - is based on the sound intensity in normal direction and the sound pressure on the radiating surface. Assuming a unit radiation efficiency all-over the surface and neglecting local effects, this is a common approach for an upper bound of structure borne noise. Therein, the sound power finally results from the squared velocity integrated over the radiating surface and the constant fluid impedance. As ERP usually requires extra post processing to consider the velocity in normal surface direction, the kinetic energy is essential in common FEA results including all velocity components apart from the normal direction, too. Thus, it is less accurate but maybe usable for optimisation abilities. In contrast, LPM is a simplification of the Rayleigh-integral and thus gives quite accurate results but requires significant higher computational costs than ERP. Possibilities and limits of estimating the emitted sound power by these three methods will be shown.
KW - Finite element method
KW - Sound radiation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84923607807
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84923607807
T3 - INTERNOISE 2014 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control
BT - INTERNOISE 2014 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering
A2 - Davy, John
A2 - Burgess, Marion
A2 - Don, Charles
A2 - Dowsett, Liz
A2 - McMinn, Terry
A2 - Broner, Norm
PB - Australian Acoustical Society
T2 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control, INTERNOISE 2014
Y2 - 16 November 2014 through 19 November 2014
ER -