TY - JOUR
T1 - FDG PET/CT
T2 - EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0
AU - Boellaard, Ronald
AU - Delgado-Bolton, Roberto
AU - Oyen, Wim J.G.
AU - Giammarile, Francesco
AU - Tatsch, Klaus
AU - Eschner, Wolfgang
AU - Verzijlbergen, Fred J.
AU - Barrington, Sally F.
AU - Pike, Lucy C.
AU - Weber, Wolfgang A.
AU - Stroobants, Sigrid
AU - Delbeke, Dominique
AU - Donohoe, Kevin J.
AU - Holbrook, Scott
AU - Graham, Michael M.
AU - Testanera, Giorgio
AU - Hoekstra, Otto S.
AU - Zijlstra, Josee
AU - Visser, Eric
AU - Hoekstra, Corneline J.
AU - Pruim, Jan
AU - Willemsen, Antoon
AU - Arends, Bertjan
AU - Kotzerke, Jörg
AU - Bockisch, Andreas
AU - Beyer, Thomas
AU - Chiti, Arturo
AU - Krause, Bernd J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The Author(s).
PY - 2015/2
Y1 - 2015/2
N2 - The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when he or she is examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and institutes that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semiquantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.
AB - The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when he or she is examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and institutes that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semiquantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.
KW - FDG
KW - Imaging procedure
KW - Oncology
KW - PET/CT
KW - Quantification
KW - Tumour
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925535468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x
DO - 10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25452219
AN - SCOPUS:84925535468
SN - 1619-7070
VL - 42
SP - 328
EP - 354
JO - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
JF - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
IS - 2
ER -