Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts

Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper explains and illustrates in an example context how case comparison in legal case-based reasoning can be modeled in the value judgment formalism. It presents a set of argument schemes corresponding to typical moves in case-based reasoning which make use of intermediate legal concepts and their impact on the applicable values.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2011 - Proceedings of the Conference
Pages161-170
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2011 - Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Duration: 6 Jun 201110 Jun 2011

Publication series

NameProceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Conference

Conference13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2011
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityPittsburgh, PA
Period6/06/1110/06/11

Keywords

  • case-based reasoning
  • intermediate legal concepts
  • legal reasoning
  • value-based argumentation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this