Experience report on implementing and simulating a routing protocol in NS-2 and NS-3

Jonathan Brugge, Laurent Paquereau, Poul E. Heegaard

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Among specialized tools for simulation of network protocols, the network simulator 2 (ns-2) has been a first choice for over a decade. Its intended successor, ns-3, has been under active development since 2006 and was first made publicly available in 2008. However, ns-3 is not a new version of ns-2, but a completely new tool, and today ns-2 and ns-3 co-exist. In this paper, we report our practical experience in implementing and simulating the same routing protocol in both tools and, based on this experience, compare ns-2 and ns-3. In particular, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the increased realism of ns-3.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2nd International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, SIMUL 2010
Pages88-93
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes
Event2nd International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, SIMUL 2010 - Nice, France
Duration: 22 Aug 201027 Aug 2010

Publication series

NameProceedings - 2nd International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, SIMUL 2010

Conference

Conference2nd International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, SIMUL 2010
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityNice
Period22/08/1027/08/10

Keywords

  • CEAS
  • Ns-2
  • Ns-3

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experience report on implementing and simulating a routing protocol in NS-2 and NS-3'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this