Evaluation of the growth function of an empirical forest scenario model

E. Thürig, E. Kaufmann, R. Frisullo, H. Bugmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Forests have an important role in the global carbon cycle as carbon pools, sinks and sources, and their quantification has become a relevant task. Empirical models based on national forest inventories are widely used for the assessment of carbon sequestration. However, these models do not treat explicitly all the processes occurring in the ecosystem, as they are mainly based on statistical relations to estimate forest development. Therefore, there is a need for validation of these models to increase confidence in the predictions of future forest development. This study evaluates an empirical single-tree model that was developed in Switzerland (MASSIMO). The accuracy and precision of the growth function of the model is evaluated with data from the National Forest Inventory (NFI) of Liechtenstein. MASSIMO was found to predict the basal area per hectare of the Liechtenstein data very precisely (underestimation of 0.65%). The main differences between observed and predicted diameter increment occur mostly for larger DBH classes, where the increment is underestimated by the model. However, these differences may be related to the precision of the input variables. For example, the explanatory variable stand age is determined with relatively low precision; therefore it shows a high variability. For future model development, either the variable stand age should be estimated more reliably, or stand age should not be an explanatory variable of the growth function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-68
Number of pages16
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume204
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Carbon sequestration
  • Forest growth model
  • Liechtenstein
  • MASSIMO
  • Model evaluation
  • NFI
  • Switzerland

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the growth function of an empirical forest scenario model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this