Evaluation of methods in terms of a holistic process representation

Oliver Schneider; Frank Hohenstein; Willibald A. Günthner

doi:10.2195/lj_NotRev_schneider_de_201110_01

Evaluation of methods in terms of a holistic process representation

Translated title of the contribution: Evaluation of methods in terms of a holistic process representation

Oliver Schneider, Frank Hohenstein, Willibald A. Günthner

Chair of Chair of Materials Handling, Material Flow, Logistics

Technical University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The optimization of internal logistics processes requires a detailed record of the processes which considers the material flow, information flow and the therefore used resources. In this regard this review compares and evaluates several common methods of process representation. The various strengths and weaknesses are summarized in a benchmark that serves as the basis for a new method that was developed under the research project, IGF-16187 N / 1.

Translated title of the contribution	Evaluation of methods in terms of a holistic process representation
Original language	English
Journal	Logistics Journal
Volume	2011
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2195/lj_NotRev_schneider_de_201110_01
State	Published - 2011

Access to Document

10.2195/lj_NotRev_schneider_de_201110_01

Cite this

@article{edf2365856374b17970f2497d9d432f9,

title = "Evaluation of methods in terms of a holistic process representation",

abstract = "The optimization of internal logistics processes requires a detailed record of the processes which considers the material flow, information flow and the therefore used resources. In this regard this review compares and evaluates several common methods of process representation. The various strengths and weaknesses are summarized in a benchmark that serves as the basis for a new method that was developed under the research project, IGF-16187 N / 1.",

author = "Oliver Schneider and Frank Hohenstein and G{\"u}nthner, {Willibald A.}",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.2195/lj_NotRev_schneider_de_201110_01",

language = "English",

volume = "2011",

journal = "Logistics Journal",

issn = "1860-7977",

publisher = "Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft fur Technische Logistik",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of methods in terms of a holistic process representation

AU - Schneider, Oliver

AU - Hohenstein, Frank

AU - Günthner, Willibald A.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The optimization of internal logistics processes requires a detailed record of the processes which considers the material flow, information flow and the therefore used resources. In this regard this review compares and evaluates several common methods of process representation. The various strengths and weaknesses are summarized in a benchmark that serves as the basis for a new method that was developed under the research project, IGF-16187 N / 1.

AB - The optimization of internal logistics processes requires a detailed record of the processes which considers the material flow, information flow and the therefore used resources. In this regard this review compares and evaluates several common methods of process representation. The various strengths and weaknesses are summarized in a benchmark that serves as the basis for a new method that was developed under the research project, IGF-16187 N / 1.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80355131445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2195/lj_NotRev_schneider_de_201110_01

DO - 10.2195/lj_NotRev_schneider_de_201110_01

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:80355131445

SN - 1860-7977

VL - 2011

JO - Logistics Journal

JF - Logistics Journal

ER -

Evaluation of methods in terms of a holistic process representation

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this