Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Existing surgical sealants fail to combine design requirements, such as sealing performance, on-demand activation and biocompatibility. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the SETALIUMTM Vascular Sealant (SVS), a novel, on-demand activatable sealant, with the commercial sealant, BioGlueVR, for the repair of vascular defects. METHODS: In an in vivo porcine model, the use of SVS was compared with BioGlue, for sealing 2-mm defects of the carotid artery and jugular vein. Animals were followed for 7 days and 5 weeks (each time point and per experimental group, n = 4), respectively. The degree of stenosis and flow velocity was determined, and the local tissue response was evaluated. RESULTS: In vivo incision closure succeeded in all cases, and SVS was superior in clinical usability, enabled by its on-demand activation. Unlike BioGlue, SVS use did not induce stenosis and was associated with physiological blood flow in all cases. Moreover, closure with SVS was associated with a low inflammatory reaction and no thrombus formation or intima proliferation, in contrast to BioGlue. CONCLUSIONS: SVS demonstrated effective and rapid sealing of 2-mm vascular defects, with favourable biocompatibility compared to BioGlue. Thus, SVS seems to be an effective and safe vascular sealant.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 715-723 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 May 2020 |
Keywords
- Biocompatibility
- Large animal model
- Pre-clinical
- Synthetic polymer
- Tissue adhesive
- Vascular sealant
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of a biocompatible sealant for on-demand repair of vascular defects-a chronic study in a large animal model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver