Evaluation of 3D registration reliability and speed-A comparison of ICP and NDT

Martin Magnusson, Andreas Nüchter, Christopher Lörken, Achim J. Lilienthal, Joachim Hertzberg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

204 Scopus citations

Abstract

To advance robotic science it is important to perform experiments that can be replicated by other researchers to compare different methods. However, these comparisons tend to be biased, since re-implementations of reference methods often lack thoroughness and do not include the hands-on experience obtained during the original development process. This paper presents a thorough comparison of 3D scan registration algorithms based on a 3D mapping field experiment, carried out by two research groups that are leading in the field of 3D robotic mapping. The iterative closest points algorithm (ICP) is compared to the normal distributions transform (NDT). We also present an improved version of NDT with a substantially larger valley of convergence than previously published versions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA '09
Pages3907-3912
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA '09 - Kobe, Japan
Duration: 12 May 200917 May 2009

Publication series

NameProceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
ISSN (Print)1050-4729

Conference

Conference2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA '09
Country/TerritoryJapan
CityKobe
Period12/05/0917/05/09

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of 3D registration reliability and speed-A comparison of ICP and NDT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this