TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration
AU - Klein, Arno
AU - Andersson, Jesper
AU - Ardekani, Babak A.
AU - Ashburner, John
AU - Avants, Brian
AU - Chiang, Ming Chang
AU - Christensen, Gary E.
AU - Collins, D. Louis
AU - Gee, James
AU - Hellier, Pierre
AU - Song, Joo Hyun
AU - Jenkinson, Mark
AU - Lepage, Claude
AU - Rueckert, Daniel
AU - Thompson, Paul
AU - Vercauteren, Tom
AU - Woods, Roger P.
AU - Mann, J. John
AU - Parsey, Ramin V.
N1 - Funding Information:
The first author would like to extend his sincere gratitude to the participants in this study for their guidance and support in the use of their software, which in some cases took the form of new pre-release software and reslicing algorithms. He is grateful to his colleagues in the Division of Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, and thanks Steve Ellis, Todd Ogden, Satrajit Ghosh, and Jack Grinband for their helpful discussions. And of course he thanks his two closest colleagues Deepanjana and Ellora. This work was partially funded by the National Institutes of Health through NIH grant P50-MH062185. The LPBA40 MR and label data were provided by the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging at UCLA and are available at http://www.loni.ucla.edu/Atlases/LPBA40 . The IBSR18 MR and label data were provided by the Center for Morphometric Analysis at Massachusetts General Hospital and are available at http://www.cma.mgh.harvard.edu/ibsr/ . The CUMC12 data were provided by Brett Mensh, and the MGH10 data were provided by Satrajit Ghosh and Jason Tourville. The contributions to this paper by Babak A. Ardekani were supported by Grant Number R03EB008201 from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging And Bioengineering (NIBIB) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). The contributions to this paper by Gary E. Christensen and Joo Hyun Song were supported by NIH grant EB004126. Mark Jenkinson would like to thank the UK BBSRC (David Phillips Fellowship). John Ashburner is funded by the Wellcome Trust.
PY - 2009/7/1
Y1 - 2009/7/1
N2 - All fields of neuroscience that employ brain imaging need to communicate their results with reference to anatomical regions. In particular, comparative morphometry and group analysis of functional and physiological data require coregistration of brains to establish correspondences across brain structures. It is well established that linear registration of one brain to another is inadequate for aligning brain structures, so numerous algorithms have emerged to nonlinearly register brains to one another. This study is the largest evaluation of nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to brain image registration ever conducted. Fourteen algorithms from laboratories around the world are evaluated using 8 different error measures. More than 45,000 registrations between 80 manually labeled brains were performed by algorithms including: AIR, ANIMAL, ART, Diffeomorphic Demons, FNIRT, IRTK, JRD-fluid, ROMEO, SICLE, SyN, and four different SPM5 algorithms ("SPM2-type" and regular Normalization, Unified Segmentation, and the DARTEL Toolbox). All of these registrations were preceded by linear registration between the same image pairs using FLIRT. One of the most significant findings of this study is that the relative performances of the registration methods under comparison appear to be little affected by the choice of subject population, labeling protocol, and type of overlap measure. This is important because it suggests that the findings are generalizable to new subject populations that are labeled or evaluated using different labeling protocols. Furthermore, we ranked the 14 methods according to three completely independent analyses (permutation tests, one-way ANOVA tests, and indifference-zone ranking) and derived three almost identical top rankings of the methods. ART, SyN, IRTK, and SPM's DARTEL Toolbox gave the best results according to overlap and distance measures, with ART and SyN delivering the most consistently high accuracy across subjects and label sets. Updates will be published on the http://www.mindboggle.info/papers/ website.
AB - All fields of neuroscience that employ brain imaging need to communicate their results with reference to anatomical regions. In particular, comparative morphometry and group analysis of functional and physiological data require coregistration of brains to establish correspondences across brain structures. It is well established that linear registration of one brain to another is inadequate for aligning brain structures, so numerous algorithms have emerged to nonlinearly register brains to one another. This study is the largest evaluation of nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to brain image registration ever conducted. Fourteen algorithms from laboratories around the world are evaluated using 8 different error measures. More than 45,000 registrations between 80 manually labeled brains were performed by algorithms including: AIR, ANIMAL, ART, Diffeomorphic Demons, FNIRT, IRTK, JRD-fluid, ROMEO, SICLE, SyN, and four different SPM5 algorithms ("SPM2-type" and regular Normalization, Unified Segmentation, and the DARTEL Toolbox). All of these registrations were preceded by linear registration between the same image pairs using FLIRT. One of the most significant findings of this study is that the relative performances of the registration methods under comparison appear to be little affected by the choice of subject population, labeling protocol, and type of overlap measure. This is important because it suggests that the findings are generalizable to new subject populations that are labeled or evaluated using different labeling protocols. Furthermore, we ranked the 14 methods according to three completely independent analyses (permutation tests, one-way ANOVA tests, and indifference-zone ranking) and derived three almost identical top rankings of the methods. ART, SyN, IRTK, and SPM's DARTEL Toolbox gave the best results according to overlap and distance measures, with ART and SyN delivering the most consistently high accuracy across subjects and label sets. Updates will be published on the http://www.mindboggle.info/papers/ website.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64949166881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037
M3 - Article
C2 - 19195496
AN - SCOPUS:64949166881
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 46
SP - 786
EP - 802
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - 3
ER -