Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating centrality measures in large call graphs

  • Technical University of Munich

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Analytical methods for Customer Relationship Management (CRM) have gained increasing importance in today's businesses. Some industry sectors such as the telecommunication industry accumulate huge amounts of data not only about the usage behaviour of individual customers, but also about how customers interact. In addition to traditional data mining and statistical techniques, methods from the field of Social Network Analysis (SNA) are essential to leverage this special set of data. For example, call detail records of telephone operators can be used to evaluate the network of customers and derive measures for the influence of persons in such a network. This information is relevant to viral marketing, as well as various other forms of advertising and campaign management, Research in network analysis has led to a number of different centrality measures, which are potentially useful statistics for such purposes. In this paper, we compare different centrality measures based on a variety of different network topologies and model assumptions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - CEC/EEE 2006
Subtitle of host publicationJoint Conference - 8th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce and Technology (CEC 2006), 3rd IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
EventCEC/EEE 2006 Joint Conferences - San Francisco, CA, United States
Duration: 26 Jun 200629 Jun 2006

Publication series

NameCEC/EEE 2006 Joint Conferences
Volume2006

Conference

ConferenceCEC/EEE 2006 Joint Conferences
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period26/06/0629/06/06

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating centrality measures in large call graphs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this