TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental, economic, and eco-efficiency assessment of residential heating systems for low-rise buildings
AU - Naumann, Gabriel
AU - Schropp, Elke
AU - Gaderer, Matthias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - Transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable heating is essential for rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Besides greenhouse gas emissions, other environmental and economic impacts are crucial for successfully implementing renewable heating systems. This study evaluates 13 residential heating systems' environmental, economic, and eco-efficiency performance for a typical German two-story dwelling. The life cycle assessment method is employed to quantify the environmental impacts. Assuming a sustainable supply of biomass-based fuels, biomass heating systems exhibit the lowest environmental impacts, whereas gas heating systems are associated with high environmental impacts. Among heat pump systems, the water-source heat pump demonstrates the lowest environmental impact. Additionally, integrating a PV system into heat pump systems reduces the environmental impacts across all heat pumps. The evaluation indicates that the air-source heat pump is the most economical system, while the pellet boiler with solar thermal support and the heat pump with ice storage incur the highest costs. However, the cost differences among the heating systems are relatively small, making it challenging to establish a clear ranking based solely on economic evaluation. An eco-efficiency assessment, which combines environmental and economic aspects into a single indicator, reveals that the most eco-efficient systems are the air-source heat pump, both with and without a PV system, and the wood gasifier heating system. In contrast, the ice-storage heat pump and the pellet heating with solar thermal support show the lowest eco-efficiency.
AB - Transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable heating is essential for rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Besides greenhouse gas emissions, other environmental and economic impacts are crucial for successfully implementing renewable heating systems. This study evaluates 13 residential heating systems' environmental, economic, and eco-efficiency performance for a typical German two-story dwelling. The life cycle assessment method is employed to quantify the environmental impacts. Assuming a sustainable supply of biomass-based fuels, biomass heating systems exhibit the lowest environmental impacts, whereas gas heating systems are associated with high environmental impacts. Among heat pump systems, the water-source heat pump demonstrates the lowest environmental impact. Additionally, integrating a PV system into heat pump systems reduces the environmental impacts across all heat pumps. The evaluation indicates that the air-source heat pump is the most economical system, while the pellet boiler with solar thermal support and the heat pump with ice storage incur the highest costs. However, the cost differences among the heating systems are relatively small, making it challenging to establish a clear ranking based solely on economic evaluation. An eco-efficiency assessment, which combines environmental and economic aspects into a single indicator, reveals that the most eco-efficient systems are the air-source heat pump, both with and without a PV system, and the wood gasifier heating system. In contrast, the ice-storage heat pump and the pellet heating with solar thermal support show the lowest eco-efficiency.
KW - Biomass
KW - Eco-efficiency analysis
KW - Environmental impacts
KW - Heat pumps
KW - Heating sector
KW - Life cycle assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207036021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111074
DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111074
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85207036021
SN - 2352-7102
VL - 98
JO - Journal of Building Engineering
JF - Journal of Building Engineering
M1 - 111074
ER -